George Kirby vs Tarik Skubal: Career Stats Comparison

Tarik Skubal has the better career line of the two, leading 9 of the 12 scored categories on this page (4 further counting totals are shown but not scored). George Kirby has played 2022–present as a pitcher; Tarik Skubal has played 2020–present as a pitcher.

ERA (Earned Run Average):
Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
W (Wins):
Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
SO (Strikeouts):
For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.

Data updated

George Kirby (2022–present) and Tarik Skubal (2020–present) — both came up during the 2020s, so the matchup is a direct one. George Kirby has 54 wins and 769 strikeouts through October 12, 2026; Tarik Skubal has 66 wins and 1,075 strikeouts through October 12, 2026. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.

Quick answer

  • Who had the better ERA? Tarik Skubal, with 3.02 to George Kirby's 3.74.
  • Who won more games? Tarik Skubal, with 66 to George Kirby's 54.
  • Who recorded more strikeouts? Tarik Skubal, with 1,075 to George Kirby's 769.
  • Who had the better WHIP? Tarik Skubal, with 1.01 to George Kirby's 1.17.
  • Who pitched more innings? Tarik Skubal, with 925.1 to George Kirby's 812.1.
  • Who threw more shutouts? Tarik Skubal, with 1 to George Kirby's 0.
  • Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Tarik Skubal, with 20,288 career Pitcher PIV to George Kirby's 14,778.
Leads Tarik Skubal 9 of 12 scored categories (1 tied)
Pitcher PIV edge Tarik Skubal +5,509
Read the verdict ↓

George Kirby

Pitcher · 2022–present
Wins
54
Losses
45
Strikeouts
769
ERA
3.74
WHIP
1.17
IP
812.1
View George Kirby's full profile →

Tarik Skubal

Pitcher · 2020–present
Wins
66
Losses
44
Strikeouts
1,075
ERA
3.02
WHIP
1.01
IP
925.1
View Tarik Skubal's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 12 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 4 are counting totals on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded them. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, so read them against the run environment each player worked in, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

George Kirby and Tarik Skubal are still active — their totals below are current through October 12, 2026.

George Kirby vs Tarik Skubal: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic George Kirby Tarik Skubal
Wins 54 Leads: 66
Losses not scored 45 44
Games 142 Leads: 163
Games Started 142 Leads: 160
Complete Games Leads: 2 1
Shutouts 0 Leads: 1
Saves 0 0
Strikeouts 769 Leads: 1,075
Walks not scored 140 199
Hits Allowed not scored 813 740
Home Runs Allowed not scored 94 104
Innings Pitched 812.1 Leads: 925.1
ERA 3.74 Leads: 3.02
WHIP 1.17 Leads: 1.01
K/9 8.52 Leads: 10.46
BB/9 Leads: 1.55 1.94

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Tarik Skubal outpaces George Kirby 20,288 to 14,778 — a longevity gap rather than a per-season one: Tarik Skubal played 6 seasons to George Kirby's 4, while George Kirby carries the higher per-season figure (3,695 to 3,381). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

George Kirby
14,778
Career Pitcher PIV · 3,695 per season (4 seasons)
Tarik Skubal
20,288
Career Pitcher PIV · 3,381 per season (6 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).

George Kirby — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

20233.35 ERA13-10, 172 K in 190 IP
20223.39 ERA8-5, 133 K in 130 IP
20243.53 ERA14-11, 179 K in 191 IP

Tarik Skubal — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

20252.21 ERA13-6, 241 K in 195 IP
20242.39 ERA18-4, 228 K in 192 IP
2026 (in progress)2.72 ERA12-7, 186 K in 158 IP

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Tarik Skubal leads in wins, strikeouts, ERA, and WHIP, while George Kirby owns no headline categories. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Tarik Skubal. PIV agrees: Tarik Skubal grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the George Kirby and Tarik Skubal careers compare

George Kirby and Tarik Skubal are both active, and their careers have run side by side since 2022. With 142 games against 163 across 4 and 6 PIV seasons, neither player's totals owe much to extra seasons. Where George Kirby comes out ahead, it is in complete games (2 to 1) and walks per nine (1.55 to 1.94). The per-nine rows read 8.52 strikeouts and 1.55 walks for George Kirby, 10.46 and 1.94 for Tarik Skubal. Both had the same role: George Kirby was mainly a starter (142 starts in 142 games); Tarik Skubal was mainly a starter (160 starts in 163 games). In WHIP, Tarik Skubal's 1.01 beats George Kirby's 1.17. Because George Kirby and Tarik Skubal are still playing, the totals above will keep moving through the season.

George Kirby vs Tarik Skubal: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, George Kirby or Tarik Skubal?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Tarik Skubal leads George Kirby in 9 of the 12 scored categories.
Who had the better ERA?
Tarik Skubal, with 3.02 to George Kirby's 3.74.
Who won more games?
Tarik Skubal, with 66 to George Kirby's 54.
Who recorded more strikeouts?
Tarik Skubal, with 1,075 to George Kirby's 769.
Who had the better WHIP?
Tarik Skubal, with 1.01 to George Kirby's 1.17.