Brad Lidge vs Jonathan Papelbon: Career Stats Comparison
Jonathan Papelbon has the better career line of the two, leading 9 of the 12 scored categories on this page (4 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Brad Lidge played 2002–2012 as a pitcher; Jonathan Papelbon played 2005–2016 as a pitcher.
- ERA (Earned Run Average):
- Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
- W (Wins):
- Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
- SO (Strikeouts):
- For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
- WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
- Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.
Data updated
Brad Lidge (2002–2012) and Jonathan Papelbon (2005–2016) — both came up during the 2000s, so the matchup is a direct one. Brad Lidge finished with 26 wins and 799 strikeouts; Jonathan Papelbon finished with 41 wins and 808 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.
Quick answer
- Who had the better ERA? Jonathan Papelbon, with 2.44 to Brad Lidge's 3.54.
- Who won more games? Jonathan Papelbon, with 41 to Brad Lidge's 26.
- Who recorded more strikeouts? Jonathan Papelbon, with 808 to Brad Lidge's 799.
- Who had the better WHIP? Jonathan Papelbon, with 1.04 to Brad Lidge's 1.29.
- Who pitched more innings? Jonathan Papelbon, with 725.2 to Brad Lidge's 603.1.
- Who threw more shutouts? Neither — both are at 0.
- Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Jonathan Papelbon, with 24,416 career Pitcher PIV to Brad Lidge's 17,126.
Jonathan Papelbon
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 12 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 4 are counting totals on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded them. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, so read them against the run environment each player worked in, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.
| Statistic | Brad Lidge | Jonathan Papelbon |
|---|---|---|
| Wins | 26 | Leads: 41 |
| Losses not scored | 32 | 36 |
| Games | 603 | Leads: 689 |
| Games Started | 1 | Leads: 3 |
| Complete Games | 0 | 0 |
| Shutouts | 0 | 0 |
| Saves | 225 | Leads: 368 |
| Strikeouts | 799 | Leads: 808 |
| Walks not scored | 287 | 185 |
| Hits Allowed not scored | 492 | 572 |
| Home Runs Allowed not scored | 57 | 57 |
| Innings Pitched | 603.1 | Leads: 725.2 |
| ERA | 3.54 | Leads: 2.44 |
| WHIP | 1.29 | Leads: 1.04 |
| K/9 | Leads: 11.92 | 10.02 |
| BB/9 | 4.28 | Leads: 2.29 |
PIV Comparison through 2025
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Jonathan Papelbon outpaces Brad Lidge 24,416 to 17,126 — driven by both sides of the ledger: 1,878 PIV per season to 1,557, across 13 seasons to 11. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).
Brad Lidge
No seasons meet the qualifying workload, so there is no peak-season list to show.
Jonathan Papelbon
No seasons meet the qualifying workload, so there is no peak-season list to show.
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Jonathan Papelbon leads in wins, strikeouts, ERA, and WHIP, while Brad Lidge owns K/9. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Jonathan Papelbon. PIV agrees: Jonathan Papelbon grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.
Related Matchups
How the Brad Lidge and Jonathan Papelbon careers compare
The careers of Brad Lidge (2002–2012) and Jonathan Papelbon (2005–2016) overlapped from 2005 to 2012, so for those seasons they faced the same league conditions. With 603 games against 689 across 11 and 13 PIV seasons, neither player's totals owe much to extra seasons. Where Brad Lidge comes out ahead, it is in strikeouts per nine (11.92 to 10.02). The per-nine rows read 11.92 strikeouts and 4.28 walks for Brad Lidge, 10.02 and 2.29 for Jonathan Papelbon. Both had the same role: Brad Lidge worked mostly in relief (1 starts in 603 games, 225 saves); Jonathan Papelbon worked mostly in relief (3 starts in 689 games, 368 saves).
Brad Lidge vs Jonathan Papelbon: Frequently Asked Questions
- Who was better, Brad Lidge or Jonathan Papelbon?
- By the career statistics compared on this page, Jonathan Papelbon leads Brad Lidge in 9 of the 12 scored categories.
- Who had the better ERA?
- Jonathan Papelbon, with 2.44 to Brad Lidge's 3.54.
- Who won more games?
- Jonathan Papelbon, with 41 to Brad Lidge's 26.
- Who recorded more strikeouts?
- Jonathan Papelbon, with 808 to Brad Lidge's 799.
- Who had the better WHIP?
- Jonathan Papelbon, with 1.04 to Brad Lidge's 1.29.