Tim Lincecum vs Blake Snell: Career Stats Comparison
Tim Lincecum (2007–2016) and Blake Snell (2016–present) — breaking in during the 2000s and the 2010s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. Tim Lincecum compiled 110 wins and 1,736 strikeouts; Blake Snell put up 81 wins and 1,440 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.
Tim Lincecum
Blake Snell
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. For pitchers, lower ERA, WHIP, and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads.
| Statistic | Tim Lincecum | Blake Snell |
|---|---|---|
| Wins | 110 | 81 |
| Losses | 89 | 62 |
| Games | 278 | 222 |
| Games Started | 270 | 222 |
| Complete Games | 10 | 1 |
| Shutouts | 7 | 1 |
| Saves | 1 | 0 |
| Strikeouts | 1,736 | 1,440 |
| Walks | 669 | 521 |
| Hits Allowed | 1,506 | 891 |
| Home Runs Allowed | 147 | 111 |
| Innings Pitched | 1,682 | 1,158 |
| ERA | 3.74 | 3.15 |
| WHIP | 1.29 | 1.22 |
| K/9 | 9.29 | 11.19 |
| BB/9 | 3.58 | 4.05 |
PIV Comparison
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Tim Lincecum edges Blake Snell 28,769 to 27,494 — a gap driven primarily by per-season impact (2,877 vs 2,749 per year). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).
Tim Lincecum — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Blake Snell — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Tim Lincecum leads in wins, strikeouts, and innings pitched, while Blake Snell owns ERA, WHIP, and K/9. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Tim Lincecum. PIV agrees: Tim Lincecum grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.