Tim Lincecum vs Ed Walsh: Career Stats Comparison
Ed Walsh has the better career line of the two, leading 10 of the 12 scored categories on this page (4 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Tim Lincecum played 2007–2016 as a pitcher; Ed Walsh played 1904–1917 as a pitcher.
- ERA (Earned Run Average):
- Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
- W (Wins):
- Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
- SO (Strikeouts):
- For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
- WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
- Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.
Data updated
Tim Lincecum (2007–2016) and Ed Walsh (1904–1917) — breaking in during the 2000s and the 1900s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. Tim Lincecum finished with 110 wins and 1,736 strikeouts; Ed Walsh finished with 195 wins and 1,736 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.
Quick answer
- Who had the better ERA? Ed Walsh, with 1.82 to Tim Lincecum's 3.74.
- Who won more games? Ed Walsh, with 195 to Tim Lincecum's 110.
- Who recorded more strikeouts? Neither — both are at 1,736.
- Who had the better WHIP? Ed Walsh, with 1.00 to Tim Lincecum's 1.29.
- Who pitched more innings? Ed Walsh, with 2,964.1 to Tim Lincecum's 1,682.0.
- Who threw more shutouts? Ed Walsh, with 57 to Tim Lincecum's 7.
- Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Ed Walsh, with 62,631 career Pitcher PIV to Tim Lincecum's 28,769.
Tim Lincecum
Ed Walsh
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 12 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 4 are counting totals on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded them. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 2000s and the 1900s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.
| Statistic | Tim Lincecum | Ed Walsh |
|---|---|---|
| Wins | 110 | Leads: 195 |
| Losses not scored | 89 | 126 |
| Games | 278 | Leads: 430 |
| Games Started | 270 | Leads: 315 |
| Complete Games | 10 | Leads: 250 |
| Shutouts | 7 | Leads: 57 |
| Saves | 1 | Leads: 35 |
| Strikeouts | 1,736 | 1,736 |
| Walks not scored | 669 | 617 |
| Hits Allowed not scored | 1,506 | 2,346 |
| Home Runs Allowed not scored | 147 | 23 |
| Innings Pitched | 1,682.0 | Leads: 2,964.1 |
| ERA | 3.74 | Leads: 1.82 |
| WHIP | 1.29 | Leads: 1.00 |
| K/9 | Leads: 9.29 | 5.27 |
| BB/9 | 3.58 | Leads: 1.87 |
PIV Comparison through 2025
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Ed Walsh outpaces Tim Lincecum 62,631 to 28,769 — driven by both sides of the ledger: 4,474 PIV per season to 2,877, across 14 seasons to 10. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).
Tim Lincecum — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Ed Walsh — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Ed Walsh leads in wins, ERA, WHIP, and innings pitched, while Tim Lincecum owns K/9. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Ed Walsh. PIV agrees: Ed Walsh grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.
Related Matchups
How the Tim Lincecum and Ed Walsh careers compare
The two careers never overlapped: Ed Walsh's ended in 1917, and Tim Lincecum debuted in 2007. The table compares 278 games of Tim Lincecum with 430 of Ed Walsh across 10 and 14 PIV seasons; totals favor the longer career by default. Where Tim Lincecum comes out ahead, it is in strikeouts per nine (9.29 to 5.27). The per-nine rows read 9.29 strikeouts and 3.58 walks for Tim Lincecum, 5.27 and 1.87 for Ed Walsh. Both had the same role: Tim Lincecum was mainly a starter (270 starts in 278 games); Ed Walsh was mainly a starter (315 starts in 430 games).
Tim Lincecum vs Ed Walsh: Frequently Asked Questions
- Who was better, Tim Lincecum or Ed Walsh?
- By the career statistics compared on this page, Ed Walsh leads Tim Lincecum in 10 of the 12 scored categories.
- Who had the better ERA?
- Ed Walsh, with 1.82 to Tim Lincecum's 3.74.
- Who won more games?
- Ed Walsh, with 195 to Tim Lincecum's 110.
- Who recorded more strikeouts?
- Neither — both are at 1,736.
- Who had the better WHIP?
- Ed Walsh, with 1.00 to Tim Lincecum's 1.29.