Francisco Lindor vs Joe Sewell: Career Stats Comparison

Joe Sewell has the better career line of the two, leading 10 of the 14 scored categories on this page (1 further counting total is shown but not scored). Francisco Lindor has played 2015–present as a hitter; Joe Sewell played 1920–1933 as a hitter.

AVG (Batting Average):
Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
HR (Home Runs):
Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
RBI (Runs Batted In):
Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.

Data updated

Francisco Lindor (2015–present) and Joe Sewell (1920–1933) — they broke in during the 2010s and the 1920s respectively, which makes the side-by-side worth doing carefully. Francisco Lindor has 1,758 hits and 300 home runs through October 12, 2026; Joe Sewell finished with 2,226 hits and 49 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.

Quick answer

  • Who hit more home runs? Francisco Lindor, with 300 to Joe Sewell's 49.
  • Who had the higher OPS? Francisco Lindor, with .812 to Joe Sewell's .804.
  • Who had the higher batting average? Joe Sewell, with .312 to Francisco Lindor's .270.
  • Who had more hits? Joe Sewell, with 2,226 to Francisco Lindor's 1,758.
  • Who drove in more runs? Joe Sewell, with 1,055 to Francisco Lindor's 905.
  • Who has the higher career PIV? Joe Sewell, with 15,785 career PIV to Francisco Lindor's 14,684.
  • Who won more championships? Joe Sewell, with 2 World Series titles to Francisco Lindor's 0.
Leads Joe Sewell 10 of 14 scored categories
PIV edge Joe Sewell +1,101
Read the verdict ↓

Francisco Lindor

Hitter · 2015–present
Games
1,640
Hits
1,758
Home Runs
300
RBI
905
Avg
.270
OPS
.812
View Francisco Lindor's full profile →

Joe Sewell

Hitter · 1920–1933
Games
1,903
Hits
2,226
Home Runs
49
RBI
1,055
Avg
.312
OPS
.804
View Joe Sewell's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Francisco Lindor and Joe Sewell. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. 14 of the 15 lines below are scored; the other one is a counting total on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded it. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 2010s and the 1920s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Francisco Lindor is still active — his totals below are current through October 12, 2026.

Francisco Lindor vs Joe Sewell: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Francisco Lindor Joe Sewell
Games 1,640 Leads: 1,903
At-Bats 6,504 Leads: 7,132
Runs 1,074 Leads: 1,141
Hits 1,758 Leads: 2,226
Doubles 351 Leads: 436
Triples 30 Leads: 68
Home Runs Leads: 300 49
RBI 905 Leads: 1,055
Walks 634 Leads: 842
Strikeouts not scored 1,215 114
Stolen Bases Leads: 219 74
Batting Avg .270 Leads: .312
On-Base % .340 Leads: .391
Slugging % Leads: .472 .413
OPS Leads: .812 .804

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Joe Sewell edges Francisco Lindor 15,785 to 14,684 — a longevity gap rather than a per-season one: Joe Sewell played 14 seasons to Francisco Lindor's 11, while Francisco Lindor carries the higher per-season figure (1,335 to 1,128). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Francisco Lindor
14,684
Career PIV · 1,335 per season (11 seasons)
Joe Sewell
15,785
Career PIV · 1,128 per season (14 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).

Francisco Lindor — top 3 seasons by OPS

2018.871 OPS38 HR, 92 RBI, .277 avg
2019.854 OPS32 HR, 74 RBI, .284 avg
2024.844 OPS33 HR, 91 RBI, .273 avg

Joe Sewell — top 3 seasons by OPS

1923.935 OPS3 HR, 109 RBI, .353 avg
1921.856 OPS4 HR, 93 RBI, .318 avg
1926.832 OPS4 HR, 85 RBI, .324 avg

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Joe Sewell leads in hits, RBI, runs, and batting average, while Francisco Lindor owns home runs, stolen bases, and OPS. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Joe Sewell. PIV agrees: Joe Sewell grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Francisco Lindor and Joe Sewell careers compare

No season is shared: Joe Sewell played 1920–1933, Francisco Lindor 2015–present. The two careers are close in length, 1,640 games for Francisco Lindor and 1,903 for Joe Sewell across 11 and 14 PIV seasons, so the totals compare on fairly even terms. Francisco Lindor's edges on the table are home runs (300 to 49), stolen bases (219 to 74), and slugging percentage (.472 to .413). Plate discipline differs: Francisco Lindor struck out more than walked (1,215 to 634), but Joe Sewell walked more often than struck out (842 walks, 114 strikeouts). Home runs make up a larger share of Francisco Lindor's hits: 300 of 1,758 for Francisco Lindor, 49 of 2,226 for Joe Sewell. Francisco Lindor's numbers are live and update with each game, so the comparison is a snapshot.

Francisco Lindor vs Joe Sewell: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Francisco Lindor or Joe Sewell?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Joe Sewell leads Francisco Lindor in 10 of the 14 scored categories.
Did Francisco Lindor or Joe Sewell hit more home runs?
Francisco Lindor, with 300 to Joe Sewell's 49.
Who had the higher OPS?
Francisco Lindor, with .812 to Joe Sewell's .804.
Who had the higher batting average?
Joe Sewell, with .312 to Francisco Lindor's .270.
Who had more hits?
Joe Sewell, with 2,226 to Francisco Lindor's 1,758.