Frank McCormick vs Pee Wee Reese: Career Stats Comparison

Pee Wee Reese has the better career line of the two, leading 8 of the 14 scored categories on this page (1 further counting total is shown but not scored). Frank McCormick played 1934–1948 as a hitter; Pee Wee Reese played 1940–1958 as a hitter.

AVG (Batting Average):
Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
HR (Home Runs):
Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
RBI (Runs Batted In):
Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.

Data updated

Frank McCormick (1934–1948) and Pee Wee Reese (1940–1958) — they broke in during the 1930s and the 1940s respectively, which makes the side-by-side worth doing carefully. Frank McCormick finished with 1,711 hits and 128 home runs; Pee Wee Reese finished with 2,170 hits and 126 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.

Quick answer

  • Who hit more home runs? Frank McCormick, with 128 to Pee Wee Reese's 126.
  • Who had the higher OPS? Frank McCormick, with .781 to Pee Wee Reese's .743.
  • Who had the higher batting average? Frank McCormick, with .299 to Pee Wee Reese's .269.
  • Who had more hits? Pee Wee Reese, with 2,170 to Frank McCormick's 1,711.
  • Who drove in more runs? Frank McCormick, with 951 to Pee Wee Reese's 885.
  • Who has the higher career PIV? Frank McCormick, with 11,670 career PIV to Pee Wee Reese's 10,057.
  • Who won more championships? Both — each won 1 World Series title.
Leads Pee Wee Reese 8 of 14 scored categories
PIV edge Frank McCormick +1,613
Read the verdict ↓

Frank McCormick

Hitter · 1934–1948
Games
1,534
Hits
1,711
Home Runs
128
RBI
951
Avg
.299
OPS
.781
View Frank McCormick's full profile →

Pee Wee Reese

Hitter · 1940–1958
Games
2,166
Hits
2,170
Home Runs
126
RBI
885
Avg
.269
OPS
.743
View Pee Wee Reese's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Frank McCormick and Pee Wee Reese. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. 14 of the 15 lines below are scored; the other one is a counting total on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded it. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 1930s and the 1940s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Frank McCormick vs Pee Wee Reese: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Frank McCormick Pee Wee Reese
Games 1,534 Leads: 2,166
At-Bats 5,723 Leads: 8,058
Runs 722 Leads: 1,338
Hits 1,711 Leads: 2,170
Doubles Leads: 334 330
Triples 26 Leads: 80
Home Runs Leads: 128 126
RBI Leads: 951 885
Walks 399 Leads: 1,210
Strikeouts not scored 189 890
Stolen Bases 27 Leads: 232
Batting Avg Leads: .299 .269
On-Base % .348 Leads: .366
Slugging % Leads: .434 .377
OPS Leads: .781 .743

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Frank McCormick leads Pee Wee Reese 11,670 to 10,057 — driven by per-season impact — 834 PIV per season to 629 — rather than by longevity, since Frank McCormick played 14 seasons to Pee Wee Reese's 16. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Frank McCormick
11,670
Career PIV · 834 per season (14 seasons)
Pee Wee Reese
10,057
Career PIV · 629 per season (16 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).

Frank McCormick — top 3 seasons by OPS

1939.869 OPS18 HR, 128 RBI, .332 avg
1944.853 OPS20 HR, 102 RBI, .305 avg
1940.850 OPS19 HR, 127 RBI, .309 avg

Pee Wee Reese — top 3 seasons by OPS

1954.859 OPS10 HR, 69 RBI, .309 avg
1947.841 OPS12 HR, 73 RBI, .284 avg
1949.806 OPS16 HR, 73 RBI, .279 avg

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Frank McCormick leads in home runs, RBI, batting average, and OPS, while Pee Wee Reese owns hits, runs, and stolen bases. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Frank McCormick. PIV agrees: Frank McCormick grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Frank McCormick and Pee Wee Reese careers compare

The careers of Frank McCormick (1934–1948) and Pee Wee Reese (1940–1958) overlapped from 1940 to 1948, so for those seasons they faced the same league conditions. With 1,534 games against 2,166 across 14 and 16 PIV seasons, neither player's totals owe much to extra seasons. At the plate, Frank McCormick walked more often than struck out (399 walks, 189 strikeouts), and Pee Wee Reese walked more often than struck out (1,210 walks, 890 strikeouts). On the bases, Pee Wee Reese stole more often per game played (27 steals in 1,534 games for Frank McCormick, 232 in 2,166 for Pee Wee Reese). In on-base percentage, Pee Wee Reese holds the edge, .366 to .348.

Frank McCormick vs Pee Wee Reese: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Frank McCormick or Pee Wee Reese?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Pee Wee Reese leads Frank McCormick in 8 of the 14 scored categories.
Did Frank McCormick or Pee Wee Reese hit more home runs?
Frank McCormick, with 128 to Pee Wee Reese's 126.
Who had the higher OPS?
Frank McCormick, with .781 to Pee Wee Reese's .743.
Who had the higher batting average?
Frank McCormick, with .299 to Pee Wee Reese's .269.
Who had more hits?
Pee Wee Reese, with 2,170 to Frank McCormick's 1,711.