Mason Miller vs Dan Quisenberry: Career Stats Comparison

Dan Quisenberry has the better career line of the two, leading 6 of the 12 scored categories on this page (4 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Mason Miller has played 2023–present as a pitcher; Dan Quisenberry played 1979–1990 as a pitcher.

ERA (Earned Run Average):
Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
W (Wins):
Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
SO (Strikeouts):
For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.

Data updated

Mason Miller (2023–present) and Dan Quisenberry (1979–1990) — breaking in during the 2020s and the 1970s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. Mason Miller has 8 wins and 375 strikeouts through October 12, 2026; Dan Quisenberry finished with 56 wins and 379 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.

Quick answer

  • Who had the better ERA? Mason Miller, with 2.47 to Dan Quisenberry's 2.76.
  • Who won more games? Dan Quisenberry, with 56 to Mason Miller's 8.
  • Who recorded more strikeouts? Dan Quisenberry, with 379 to Mason Miller's 375.
  • Who had the better WHIP? Mason Miller, with 0.94 to Dan Quisenberry's 1.18.
  • Who pitched more innings? Dan Quisenberry, with 1,043.1 to Mason Miller's 230.0.
  • Who threw more shutouts? Neither — both are at 0.
  • Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Dan Quisenberry, with 16,859 career Pitcher PIV to Mason Miller's 6,845.
Leads Dan Quisenberry 6 of 12 scored categories (2 tied)
Pitcher PIV edge Dan Quisenberry +10,014
Read the verdict ↓

Mason Miller

Pitcher · 2023–present
Wins
8
Losses
9
Strikeouts
375
ERA
2.47
WHIP
0.94
IP
230.0
View Mason Miller's full profile →

Dan Quisenberry

Pitcher · 1979–1990
Wins
56
Losses
46
Strikeouts
379
ERA
2.76
WHIP
1.18
IP
1,043.1
View Dan Quisenberry's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 12 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 4 are counting totals on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded them. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 2020s and the 1970s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Mason Miller is still active — his totals below are current through October 12, 2026.

Mason Miller vs Dan Quisenberry: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Mason Miller Dan Quisenberry
Wins 8 Leads: 56
Losses not scored 9 46
Games 191 Leads: 674
Games Started Leads: 6 0
Complete Games 0 0
Shutouts 0 0
Saves 88 Leads: 244
Strikeouts 375 Leads: 379
Walks not scored 91 162
Hits Allowed not scored 125 1,064
Home Runs Allowed not scored 16 59
Innings Pitched 230.0 Leads: 1,043.1
ERA Leads: 2.47 2.76
WHIP Leads: 0.94 1.18
K/9 Leads: 14.67 3.27
BB/9 3.56 Leads: 1.40

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Dan Quisenberry outpaces Mason Miller 16,859 to 6,845 — a longevity gap rather than a per-season one: Dan Quisenberry played 13 seasons to Mason Miller's 4, while Mason Miller carries the higher per-season figure (1,711 to 1,297). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Mason Miller
6,845
Career Pitcher PIV · 1,711 per season (4 seasons)
Dan Quisenberry
16,859
Career Pitcher PIV · 1,297 per season (13 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).

Mason Miller

No seasons meet the qualifying workload, so there is no peak-season list to show.

Dan Quisenberry — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19831.94 ERA5-3, 48 K in 139 IP
19852.37 ERA8-9, 54 K in 129 IP
19822.57 ERA9-7, 46 K in 136 IP

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Dan Quisenberry leads in wins, strikeouts, and innings pitched, while Mason Miller owns ERA, WHIP, and K/9. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Dan Quisenberry. PIV agrees: Dan Quisenberry grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Mason Miller and Dan Quisenberry careers compare

The two careers never overlapped: Dan Quisenberry's ended in 1990, and Mason Miller debuted in 2023. The table compares 191 games of Mason Miller with 674 of Dan Quisenberry across 4 and 13 PIV seasons; totals favor the longer career by default. The green cells for Mason Miller are starts (6 to 0), ERA (2.47 to 2.76), and WHIP (0.94 to 1.18). By rate, Mason Miller struck out 14.67 and walked 3.56 per nine innings; Dan Quisenberry struck out 3.27 and walked 1.40. Mason Miller worked mostly in relief (6 starts in 191 games, 88 saves), and Dan Quisenberry worked mostly in relief (0 starts in 674 games, 244 saves). Because Mason Miller is still playing, the totals above will keep moving through the season.

Mason Miller vs Dan Quisenberry: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Mason Miller or Dan Quisenberry?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Dan Quisenberry leads Mason Miller in 6 of the 12 scored categories.
Who had the better ERA?
Mason Miller, with 2.47 to Dan Quisenberry's 2.76.
Who won more games?
Dan Quisenberry, with 56 to Mason Miller's 8.
Who recorded more strikeouts?
Dan Quisenberry, with 379 to Mason Miller's 375.
Who had the better WHIP?
Mason Miller, with 0.94 to Dan Quisenberry's 1.18.