Eddie Murray vs Jim Rice: Career Stats Comparison

Eddie Murray has the better career line of the two, leading 10 of the 14 scored categories on this page (1 further counting total is shown but not scored). Eddie Murray played 1977–1997 as a hitter; Jim Rice played 1974–1989 as a hitter.

AVG (Batting Average):
Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
HR (Home Runs):
Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
RBI (Runs Batted In):
Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.

Data updated

Eddie Murray (1977–1997) and Jim Rice (1974–1989) — both broke in during the 1970s, which makes the head-to-head feel like a contemporaries' debate. Eddie Murray finished with 3,255 hits and 504 home runs; Jim Rice finished with 2,452 hits and 382 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.

Quick answer

  • Who hit more home runs? Eddie Murray, with 504 to Jim Rice's 382.
  • Who had the higher OPS? Jim Rice, with .854 to Eddie Murray's .836.
  • Who had the higher batting average? Jim Rice, with .298 to Eddie Murray's .287.
  • Who had more hits? Eddie Murray, with 3,255 to Jim Rice's 2,452.
  • Who drove in more runs? Eddie Murray, with 1,917 to Jim Rice's 1,451.
  • Who has the higher career PIV? Eddie Murray, with 37,651 career PIV to Jim Rice's 31,418.
  • Who won more championships? Eddie Murray, with 1 World Series title to Jim Rice's 0.
Leads Eddie Murray 10 of 14 scored categories
PIV edge Eddie Murray +6,233
Read the verdict ↓

Eddie Murray

Hitter · 1977–1997
Games
3,026
Hits
3,255
Home Runs
504
RBI
1,917
Avg
.287
OPS
.836
View Eddie Murray's full profile →

Jim Rice

Hitter · 1974–1989
Games
2,089
Hits
2,452
Home Runs
382
RBI
1,451
Avg
.298
OPS
.854
View Jim Rice's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Eddie Murray and Jim Rice. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. 14 of the 15 lines below are scored; the other one is a counting total on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded it. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, so read them against the run environment each player worked in, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Eddie Murray vs Jim Rice: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Eddie Murray Jim Rice
Games Leads: 3,026 2,089
At-Bats Leads: 11,336 8,225
Runs Leads: 1,627 1,249
Hits Leads: 3,255 2,452
Doubles Leads: 560 373
Triples 35 Leads: 79
Home Runs Leads: 504 382
RBI Leads: 1,917 1,451
Walks Leads: 1,333 670
Strikeouts not scored 1,516 1,423
Stolen Bases Leads: 110 58
Batting Avg .287 Leads: .298
On-Base % Leads: .359 .352
Slugging % .476 Leads: .502
OPS .836 Leads: .854

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Eddie Murray leads Jim Rice 37,651 to 31,418 — a longevity gap rather than a per-season one: Eddie Murray played 23 seasons to Jim Rice's 16, while Jim Rice carries the higher per-season figure (1,964 to 1,637). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Eddie Murray
37,651
Career PIV · 1,637 per season (23 seasons)
Jim Rice
31,418
Career PIV · 1,964 per season (16 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).

Eddie Murray — top 3 seasons by OPS

1982.940 OPS32 HR, 110 RBI, .316 avg
1990.934 OPS26 HR, 95 RBI, .330 avg
1983.930 OPS33 HR, 111 RBI, .306 avg

Jim Rice — top 3 seasons by OPS

1979.977 OPS39 HR, 130 RBI, .325 avg
1978.970 OPS46 HR, 139 RBI, .315 avg
1977.969 OPS39 HR, 114 RBI, .320 avg

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Eddie Murray leads in hits, home runs, RBI, and runs, while Jim Rice owns batting average and OPS. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Eddie Murray. PIV agrees: Eddie Murray grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Eddie Murray and Jim Rice careers compare

The careers of Eddie Murray (1977–1997) and Jim Rice (1974–1989) overlapped from 1977 to 1989, so for those seasons they faced the same league conditions. The two careers are close in length, 3,026 games for Eddie Murray and 2,089 for Jim Rice across 23 and 16 PIV seasons, so the totals compare on fairly even terms. The green cells for Jim Rice are triples (79 to 35), batting average (.298 to .287), and slugging percentage (.502 to .476). At the plate, Eddie Murray struck out more than walked (1,516 to 1,333), and Jim Rice struck out more than walked (1,423 to 670). Eddie Murray was the more frequent base stealer relative to games played.

Eddie Murray vs Jim Rice: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Eddie Murray or Jim Rice?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Eddie Murray leads Jim Rice in 10 of the 14 scored categories.
Did Eddie Murray or Jim Rice hit more home runs?
Eddie Murray, with 504 to Jim Rice's 382.
Who had the higher OPS?
Jim Rice, with .854 to Eddie Murray's .836.
Who had the higher batting average?
Jim Rice, with .298 to Eddie Murray's .287.
Who had more hits?
Eddie Murray, with 3,255 to Jim Rice's 2,452.

See These Players in Another Era