Hal Newhouser vs Blake Snell: Career Stats Comparison
Hal Newhouser has the better career line of the two, leading 10 of the 12 scored categories on this page (4 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Hal Newhouser played 1939–1955 as a pitcher; Blake Snell has played 2016–present as a pitcher.
- ERA (Earned Run Average):
- Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
- W (Wins):
- Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
- SO (Strikeouts):
- For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
- WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
- Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.
Data updated
Hal Newhouser (1939–1955) and Blake Snell (2016–present) — breaking in during the 1930s and the 2010s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. Hal Newhouser finished with 207 wins and 1,796 strikeouts; Blake Snell has 85 wins and 1,495 strikeouts through October 12, 2026. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.
Quick answer
- Who had the better ERA? Hal Newhouser, with 3.06 to Blake Snell's 3.10.
- Who won more games? Hal Newhouser, with 207 to Blake Snell's 85.
- Who recorded more strikeouts? Hal Newhouser, with 1,796 to Blake Snell's 1,495.
- Who had the better WHIP? Blake Snell, with 1.22 to Hal Newhouser's 1.31.
- Who pitched more innings? Hal Newhouser, with 2,993.0 to Blake Snell's 1,200.2.
- Who threw more shutouts? Hal Newhouser, with 33 to Blake Snell's 1.
- Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Hal Newhouser, with 43,492 career Pitcher PIV to Blake Snell's 27,494.
Hal Newhouser
Blake Snell
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 12 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 4 are counting totals on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded them. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 1930s and the 2010s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.
Blake Snell is still active — his totals below are current through October 12, 2026.
| Statistic | Hal Newhouser | Blake Snell |
|---|---|---|
| Wins | Leads: 207 | 85 |
| Losses not scored | 150 | 63 |
| Games | Leads: 488 | 231 |
| Games Started | Leads: 374 | 231 |
| Complete Games | Leads: 212 | 1 |
| Shutouts | Leads: 33 | 1 |
| Saves | Leads: 26 | 0 |
| Strikeouts | Leads: 1,796 | 1,495 |
| Walks not scored | 1,249 | 537 |
| Hits Allowed not scored | 2,674 | 922 |
| Home Runs Allowed not scored | 137 | 111 |
| Innings Pitched | Leads: 2,993.0 | 1,200.2 |
| ERA | Leads: 3.06 | 3.10 |
| WHIP | 1.31 | Leads: 1.22 |
| K/9 | 5.40 | Leads: 11.21 |
| BB/9 | Leads: 3.76 | 4.03 |
PIV Comparison through 2025
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Hal Newhouser outpaces Blake Snell 43,492 to 27,494 — a longevity gap rather than a per-season one: Hal Newhouser played 17 seasons to Blake Snell's 10, while Blake Snell carries the higher per-season figure (2,749 to 2,558). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).
Hal Newhouser — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Blake Snell — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Hal Newhouser leads in wins, strikeouts, ERA, and innings pitched, while Blake Snell owns WHIP and K/9. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Hal Newhouser. PIV agrees: Hal Newhouser grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.
Related Matchups
How the Hal Newhouser and Blake Snell careers compare
Hal Newhouser (1939–1955) was finished before Blake Snell (2016–present) arrived, so they never shared a league. The table compares 488 games of Hal Newhouser with 231 of Blake Snell across 17 and 10 PIV seasons; totals favor the longer career by default. Blake Snell's edges on the table are WHIP (1.22 to 1.31) and strikeouts per nine (11.21 to 5.40). The per-nine rows read 5.40 strikeouts and 3.76 walks for Hal Newhouser, 11.21 and 4.03 for Blake Snell. Both had the same role: Hal Newhouser was mainly a starter (374 starts in 488 games); Blake Snell was mainly a starter (231 starts in 231 games). Blake Snell's numbers are live and update with each game, so the comparison is a snapshot.
Hal Newhouser vs Blake Snell: Frequently Asked Questions
- Who was better, Hal Newhouser or Blake Snell?
- By the career statistics compared on this page, Hal Newhouser leads Blake Snell in 10 of the 12 scored categories.
- Who had the better ERA?
- Hal Newhouser, with 3.06 to Blake Snell's 3.10.
- Who won more games?
- Hal Newhouser, with 207 to Blake Snell's 85.
- Who recorded more strikeouts?
- Hal Newhouser, with 1,796 to Blake Snell's 1,495.
- Who had the better WHIP?
- Blake Snell, with 1.22 to Hal Newhouser's 1.31.