Deacon Phillippe vs Ed Walsh: Career Stats Comparison
Ed Walsh has the better career line of the two, leading 11 of the 12 statistical categories compared on this page. Deacon Phillippe played 1899–1911 as a pitcher; Ed Walsh played 1904–1917 as a pitcher.
- ERA (Earned Run Average):
- Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
- W (Wins):
- Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
- SO (Strikeouts):
- For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
- WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
- Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.
Data updated
Deacon Phillippe (1899–1911) and Ed Walsh (1904–1917) — breaking in during the 1890s and the 1900s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. Deacon Phillippe compiled 189 wins and 929 strikeouts; Ed Walsh put up 195 wins and 1,736 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.
Quick answer
- Who had the better ERA? Ed Walsh, with 1.82 to Deacon Phillippe's 2.59.
- Who won more games? Ed Walsh, with 195 to Deacon Phillippe's 189.
- Who recorded more strikeouts? Ed Walsh, with 1,736 to Deacon Phillippe's 929.
- Who had the better WHIP? Ed Walsh, with 1.00 to Deacon Phillippe's 1.11.
- Who pitched more innings? Ed Walsh, with 2,964 to Deacon Phillippe's 2,607.
- Who threw more shutouts? Ed Walsh, with 57 to Deacon Phillippe's 27.
- Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Ed Walsh, with 62,631 career Pitcher PIV to Deacon Phillippe's 35,866.
Deacon Phillippe
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted: compare them with the era in mind, or use the PIV card below, which is.
| Statistic | Deacon Phillippe | Ed Walsh |
|---|---|---|
| Wins | 189 | Leads: 195 |
| Losses | 109 | 126 |
| Games | 372 | Leads: 430 |
| Games Started | 289 | Leads: 315 |
| Complete Games | 242 | Leads: 250 |
| Shutouts | 27 | Leads: 57 |
| Saves | 12 | Leads: 35 |
| Strikeouts | 929 | Leads: 1,736 |
| Walks | 363 | 617 |
| Hits Allowed | 2,518 | 2,346 |
| Home Runs Allowed | 41 | 23 |
| Innings Pitched | 2,607 | Leads: 2,964 |
| ERA | 2.59 | Leads: 1.82 |
| WHIP | 1.11 | Leads: 1.00 |
| K/9 | 3.21 | Leads: 5.27 |
| BB/9 | Leads: 1.25 | 1.87 |
PIV Comparison
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Ed Walsh outpaces Deacon Phillippe 62,631 to 35,866 — a gap driven primarily by per-season impact (4,474 vs 2,759 per year). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).
Deacon Phillippe — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Ed Walsh — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Ed Walsh leads in wins, strikeouts, ERA, and WHIP, while Deacon Phillippe owns no headline categories. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Ed Walsh. PIV agrees: Ed Walsh grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.
Related Matchups
Deacon Phillippe vs Ed Walsh: Frequently Asked Questions
- Who was better, Deacon Phillippe or Ed Walsh?
- By the career statistics compared on this page, Ed Walsh leads Deacon Phillippe in 11 of 12 categories.
- Who had the better ERA?
- Ed Walsh, with 1.82 to Deacon Phillippe's 2.59.
- Who won more games?
- Ed Walsh, with 195 to Deacon Phillippe's 189.
- Who recorded more strikeouts?
- Ed Walsh, with 1,736 to Deacon Phillippe's 929.
- Who had the better WHIP?
- Ed Walsh, with 1.00 to Deacon Phillippe's 1.11.