Tarik Skubal vs Early Wynn: Career Stats Comparison

Early Wynn has the better career line of the two, leading 8 of the 12 scored categories on this page (4 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Tarik Skubal has played 2020–present as a pitcher; Early Wynn played 1939–1963 as a pitcher.

ERA (Earned Run Average):
Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
W (Wins):
Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
SO (Strikeouts):
For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.

Data updated

Tarik Skubal (2020–present) and Early Wynn (1939–1963) — breaking in during the 2020s and the 1930s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. Tarik Skubal has 66 wins and 1,075 strikeouts through October 12, 2026; Early Wynn finished with 300 wins and 2,334 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.

Quick answer

  • Who had the better ERA? Tarik Skubal, with 3.02 to Early Wynn's 3.54.
  • Who won more games? Early Wynn, with 300 to Tarik Skubal's 66.
  • Who recorded more strikeouts? Early Wynn, with 2,334 to Tarik Skubal's 1,075.
  • Who had the better WHIP? Tarik Skubal, with 1.01 to Early Wynn's 1.33.
  • Who pitched more innings? Early Wynn, with 4,564.0 to Tarik Skubal's 925.1.
  • Who threw more shutouts? Early Wynn, with 49 to Tarik Skubal's 1.
  • Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Early Wynn, with 25,348 career Pitcher PIV to Tarik Skubal's 20,288.
Leads Early Wynn 8 of 12 scored categories
Pitcher PIV edge Early Wynn +5,061
Read the verdict ↓

Tarik Skubal

Pitcher · 2020–present
Wins
66
Losses
44
Strikeouts
1,075
ERA
3.02
WHIP
1.01
IP
925.1
View Tarik Skubal's full profile →

Early Wynn

Pitcher · 1939–1963
Wins
300
Losses
244
Strikeouts
2,334
ERA
3.54
WHIP
1.33
IP
4,564.0
View Early Wynn's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 12 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 4 are counting totals on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded them. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 2020s and the 1930s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Tarik Skubal is still active — his totals below are current through October 12, 2026.

Tarik Skubal vs Early Wynn: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Tarik Skubal Early Wynn
Wins 66 Leads: 300
Losses not scored 44 244
Games 163 Leads: 691
Games Started 160 Leads: 612
Complete Games 1 Leads: 290
Shutouts 1 Leads: 49
Saves 0 Leads: 15
Strikeouts 1,075 Leads: 2,334
Walks not scored 199 1,775
Hits Allowed not scored 740 4,291
Home Runs Allowed not scored 104 338
Innings Pitched 925.1 Leads: 4,564.0
ERA Leads: 3.02 3.54
WHIP Leads: 1.01 1.33
K/9 Leads: 10.46 4.60
BB/9 Leads: 1.94 3.50

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Early Wynn leads Tarik Skubal 25,348 to 20,288 — a longevity gap rather than a per-season one: Early Wynn played 23 seasons to Tarik Skubal's 6, while Tarik Skubal carries the higher per-season figure (3,381 to 1,102). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Tarik Skubal
20,288
Career Pitcher PIV · 3,381 per season (6 seasons)
Early Wynn
25,348
Career Pitcher PIV · 1,102 per season (23 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).

Tarik Skubal — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

20252.21 ERA13-6, 241 K in 195 IP
20242.39 ERA18-4, 228 K in 192 IP
2026 (in progress)2.72 ERA12-7, 186 K in 158 IP

Early Wynn — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19562.72 ERA20-9, 158 K in 277 IP
19542.73 ERA23-11, 155 K in 270 IP
19552.82 ERA17-11, 122 K in 230 IP

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Early Wynn leads in wins, strikeouts, and innings pitched, while Tarik Skubal owns ERA, WHIP, and K/9. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Early Wynn. PIV agrees: Early Wynn grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Tarik Skubal and Early Wynn careers compare

The two careers never overlapped: Early Wynn's ended in 1963, and Tarik Skubal debuted in 2020. Early Wynn has the far longer record, 691 games against 163 across 6 and 23 PIV seasons, which inflates every career total. Where Tarik Skubal comes out ahead, it is in ERA (3.02 to 3.54), WHIP (1.01 to 1.33), and strikeouts per nine (10.46 to 4.60). The per-nine rows read 10.46 strikeouts and 1.94 walks for Tarik Skubal, 4.60 and 3.50 for Early Wynn. Both had the same role: Tarik Skubal was mainly a starter (160 starts in 163 games); Early Wynn was mainly a starter (612 starts in 691 games). Because Tarik Skubal is still playing, the totals above will keep moving through the season.

Tarik Skubal vs Early Wynn: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Tarik Skubal or Early Wynn?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Early Wynn leads Tarik Skubal in 8 of the 12 scored categories.
Who had the better ERA?
Tarik Skubal, with 3.02 to Early Wynn's 3.54.
Who won more games?
Early Wynn, with 300 to Tarik Skubal's 66.
Who recorded more strikeouts?
Early Wynn, with 2,334 to Tarik Skubal's 1,075.
Who had the better WHIP?
Tarik Skubal, with 1.01 to Early Wynn's 1.33.