Earl Averill vs Stan Musial: Career Stats Comparison
Stan Musial has the better career line of the two, leading 14 of the 14 statistical categories compared on this page. Earl Averill played 1929–1941 as a hitter; Stan Musial played 1941–1963 as a hitter.
- AVG (Batting Average):
- Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
- HR (Home Runs):
- Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
- RBI (Runs Batted In):
- Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
- OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
- On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.
Data updated
Earl Averill (1929–1941) and Stan Musial (1941–1963) — they broke in during the 1920s and the 1940s respectively, which makes the side-by-side worth doing carefully. Earl Averill finished with 2,019 hits and 238 home runs; Stan Musial finished with 3,630 hits and 475 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.
Quick answer
- Who hit more home runs? Stan Musial, with 475 to Earl Averill's 238.
- Who had the higher OPS? Stan Musial, with .976 to Earl Averill's .928.
- Who had the higher batting average? Stan Musial, with .331 to Earl Averill's .318.
- Who had more hits? Stan Musial, with 3,630 to Earl Averill's 2,019.
- Who drove in more runs? Stan Musial, with 1,951 to Earl Averill's 1,164.
- Who has the higher career PIV? Stan Musial, with 83,624 career PIV to Earl Averill's 33,953.
- Who won more championships? Stan Musial, with 3 World Series titles to Earl Averill's 0.
Earl Averill
Stan Musial
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Earl Averill and Stan Musial. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted -- a .305 in 1965 and a .298 in 2001 came out of very different run environments -- so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.
| Statistic | Earl Averill | Stan Musial |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 1,668 | Leads: 3,026 |
| At-Bats | 6,353 | Leads: 10,972 |
| Runs | 1,224 | Leads: 1,949 |
| Hits | 2,019 | Leads: 3,630 |
| Doubles | 401 | Leads: 725 |
| Triples | 128 | Leads: 177 |
| Home Runs | 238 | Leads: 475 |
| RBI | 1,164 | Leads: 1,951 |
| Walks | 774 | Leads: 1,599 |
| Strikeouts | 518 | 696 |
| Stolen Bases | 70 | Leads: 78 |
| Batting Avg | .318 | Leads: .331 |
| On-Base % | .395 | Leads: .417 |
| Slugging % | .534 | Leads: .559 |
| OPS | .928 | Leads: .976 |
PIV Comparison
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Stan Musial outpaces Earl Averill 83,624 to 33,953 — a gap driven primarily by per-season impact (3,801 vs 2,425 per year). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).
Earl Averill — top 3 seasons by OPS
Stan Musial — top 3 seasons by OPS
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Stan Musial leads in hits, home runs, RBI, and runs, while Earl Averill owns no headline categories. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Stan Musial. PIV agrees: Stan Musial grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.
Related Matchups
Earl Averill vs Stan Musial: Frequently Asked Questions
- Who was better, Earl Averill or Stan Musial?
- By the career statistics compared on this page, Stan Musial leads Earl Averill in 14 of 14 categories.
- Did Earl Averill or Stan Musial hit more home runs?
- Stan Musial, with 475 to Earl Averill's 238.
- Who had the higher OPS?
- Stan Musial, with .976 to Earl Averill's .928.
- Who had the higher batting average?
- Stan Musial, with .331 to Earl Averill's .318.
- Who had more hits?
- Stan Musial, with 3,630 to Earl Averill's 2,019.