Earl Averill vs Babe Ruth: Career Stats Comparison
Babe Ruth has the better career line of the two, leading 14 of the 14 statistical categories compared on this page. Earl Averill played 1929–1941 as a hitter; Babe Ruth played 1914–1935 as a hitter.
- AVG (Batting Average):
- Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
- HR (Home Runs):
- Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
- RBI (Runs Batted In):
- Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
- OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
- On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.
Data updated
Earl Averill (1929–1941) and Babe Ruth (1914–1935) — they broke in during the 1920s and the 1910s respectively, which makes the side-by-side worth doing carefully. Earl Averill finished with 2,019 hits and 238 home runs; Babe Ruth finished with 2,873 hits and 714 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.
Quick answer
- Who hit more home runs? Babe Ruth, with 714 to Earl Averill's 238.
- Who had the higher OPS? Babe Ruth, with 1.164 to Earl Averill's .928.
- Who had the higher batting average? Babe Ruth, with .342 to Earl Averill's .318.
- Who had more hits? Babe Ruth, with 2,873 to Earl Averill's 2,019.
- Who drove in more runs? Babe Ruth, with 2,217 to Earl Averill's 1,164.
- Who has the higher career PIV? Babe Ruth, with 111,979 career PIV to Earl Averill's 33,953.
- Who won more championships? Babe Ruth, with 7 World Series titles to Earl Averill's 0.
Earl Averill
Babe Ruth
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Earl Averill and Babe Ruth. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted -- a .305 in 1965 and a .298 in 2001 came out of very different run environments -- so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.
| Statistic | Earl Averill | Babe Ruth |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 1,668 | Leads: 2,503 |
| At-Bats | 6,353 | Leads: 8,398 |
| Runs | 1,224 | Leads: 2,174 |
| Hits | 2,019 | Leads: 2,873 |
| Doubles | 401 | Leads: 506 |
| Triples | 128 | Leads: 136 |
| Home Runs | 238 | Leads: 714 |
| RBI | 1,164 | Leads: 2,217 |
| Walks | 774 | Leads: 2,062 |
| Strikeouts | 518 | 1,330 |
| Stolen Bases | 70 | Leads: 123 |
| Batting Avg | .318 | Leads: .342 |
| On-Base % | .395 | Leads: .474 |
| Slugging % | .534 | Leads: .690 |
| OPS | .928 | Leads: 1.164 |
PIV Comparison
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Babe Ruth outpaces Earl Averill 111,979 to 33,953 — a gap driven primarily by per-season impact (5,090 vs 2,425 per year). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).
Earl Averill — top 3 seasons by OPS
Babe Ruth — top 3 seasons by OPS
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Babe Ruth leads in hits, home runs, RBI, and runs, while Earl Averill owns no headline categories. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Babe Ruth. PIV agrees: Babe Ruth grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.
Related Matchups
Earl Averill vs Babe Ruth: Frequently Asked Questions
- Who was better, Earl Averill or Babe Ruth?
- By the career statistics compared on this page, Babe Ruth leads Earl Averill in 14 of 14 categories.
- Did Earl Averill or Babe Ruth hit more home runs?
- Babe Ruth, with 714 to Earl Averill's 238.
- Who had the higher OPS?
- Babe Ruth, with 1.164 to Earl Averill's .928.
- Who had the higher batting average?
- Babe Ruth, with .342 to Earl Averill's .318.
- Who had more hits?
- Babe Ruth, with 2,873 to Earl Averill's 2,019.