Vida Blue vs Tom Seaver: Career Stats Comparison

Tom Seaver has the better career line of the two, leading 11 of the 12 scored categories on this page (4 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Vida Blue played 1969–1986 as a pitcher; Tom Seaver played 1967–1986 as a pitcher.

ERA (Earned Run Average):
Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
W (Wins):
Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
SO (Strikeouts):
For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.

Data updated

Vida Blue (1969–1986) and Tom Seaver (1967–1986) — both came up during the 1960s, so the matchup is a direct one. Vida Blue finished with 209 wins and 2,175 strikeouts; Tom Seaver finished with 311 wins and 3,640 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.

Quick answer

  • Who had the better ERA? Tom Seaver, with 2.86 to Vida Blue's 3.27.
  • Who won more games? Tom Seaver, with 311 to Vida Blue's 209.
  • Who recorded more strikeouts? Tom Seaver, with 3,640 to Vida Blue's 2,175.
  • Who had the better WHIP? Tom Seaver, with 1.12 to Vida Blue's 1.23.
  • Who pitched more innings? Tom Seaver, with 4,782.2 to Vida Blue's 3,343.1.
  • Who threw more shutouts? Tom Seaver, with 61 to Vida Blue's 37.
  • Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Tom Seaver, with 79,192 career Pitcher PIV to Vida Blue's 26,790.
Leads Tom Seaver 11 of 12 scored categories
Pitcher PIV edge Tom Seaver +52,402
Read the verdict ↓

Vida Blue

Pitcher · 1969–1986
Wins
209
Losses
161
Strikeouts
2,175
ERA
3.27
WHIP
1.23
IP
3,343.1
View Vida Blue's full profile →

Tom Seaver

Pitcher · 1967–1986
Wins
311
Losses
205
Strikeouts
3,640
ERA
2.86
WHIP
1.12
IP
4,782.2
View Tom Seaver's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 12 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 4 are counting totals on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded them. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, so read them against the run environment each player worked in, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Vida Blue vs Tom Seaver: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Vida Blue Tom Seaver
Wins 209 Leads: 311
Losses not scored 161 205
Games 502 Leads: 656
Games Started 473 Leads: 647
Complete Games 143 Leads: 231
Shutouts 37 Leads: 61
Saves Leads: 2 1
Strikeouts 2,175 Leads: 3,640
Walks not scored 1,185 1,390
Hits Allowed not scored 2,939 3,971
Home Runs Allowed not scored 263 380
Innings Pitched 3,343.1 Leads: 4,782.2
ERA 3.27 Leads: 2.86
WHIP 1.23 Leads: 1.12
K/9 5.85 Leads: 6.85
BB/9 3.19 Leads: 2.62

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Tom Seaver outpaces Vida Blue 79,192 to 26,790 — driven by both sides of the ledger: 3,600 PIV per season to 1,576, across 22 seasons to 17. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Vida Blue
26,790
Career Pitcher PIV · 1,576 per season (17 seasons)
Tom Seaver
79,192
Career Pitcher PIV · 3,600 per season (22 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).

Vida Blue — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19711.82 ERA24-8, 301 K in 312 IP
19762.35 ERA18-13, 166 K in 298 IP
19812.45 ERA8-6, 63 K in 124 IP

Tom Seaver — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19711.76 ERA20-10, 289 K in 286 IP
19732.08 ERA19-10, 251 K in 290 IP
19682.20 ERA16-12, 205 K in 277 IP

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Tom Seaver leads in wins, strikeouts, ERA, and WHIP, while Vida Blue owns no headline categories. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Tom Seaver. PIV agrees: Tom Seaver grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Vida Blue and Tom Seaver careers compare

From 1969 through 1986, Vida Blue and Tom Seaver were in the majors together. The two careers are close in length, 502 games for Vida Blue and 656 for Tom Seaver across 17 and 22 PIV seasons, so the totals compare on fairly even terms. Where Vida Blue comes out ahead, it is in saves (2 to 1). By rate, Vida Blue struck out 5.85 and walked 3.19 per nine innings; Tom Seaver struck out 6.85 and walked 2.62. Vida Blue was mainly a starter (473 starts in 502 games), and Tom Seaver was mainly a starter (647 starts in 656 games). Tom Seaver allowed fewer baserunners, a 1.12 WHIP to Vida Blue's 1.23.

Vida Blue vs Tom Seaver: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Vida Blue or Tom Seaver?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Tom Seaver leads Vida Blue in 11 of the 12 scored categories.
Who had the better ERA?
Tom Seaver, with 2.86 to Vida Blue's 3.27.
Who won more games?
Tom Seaver, with 311 to Vida Blue's 209.
Who recorded more strikeouts?
Tom Seaver, with 3,640 to Vida Blue's 2,175.
Who had the better WHIP?
Tom Seaver, with 1.12 to Vida Blue's 1.23.

See These Players in Another Era