Tom Seaver vs Cy Young: Career Stats Comparison

Cy Young has the better career line of the two, leading 9 of the 12 scored categories on this page (4 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Tom Seaver played 1967–1986 as a pitcher; Cy Young played 1890–1911 as a pitcher.

ERA (Earned Run Average):
Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
W (Wins):
Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
SO (Strikeouts):
For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.

Data updated

Tom Seaver (1967–1986) and Cy Young (1890–1911) — breaking in during the 1960s and the 1890s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. Tom Seaver finished with 311 wins and 3,640 strikeouts; Cy Young finished with 511 wins and 2,803 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.

Quick answer

  • Who had the better ERA? Cy Young, with 2.63 to Tom Seaver's 2.86.
  • Who won more games? Cy Young, with 511 to Tom Seaver's 311.
  • Who recorded more strikeouts? Tom Seaver, with 3,640 to Cy Young's 2,803.
  • Who had the better WHIP? Tom Seaver, with 1.12 to Cy Young's 1.13.
  • Who pitched more innings? Cy Young, with 7,356.0 to Tom Seaver's 4,782.2.
  • Who threw more shutouts? Cy Young, with 76 to Tom Seaver's 61.
  • Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Cy Young, with 141,398 career Pitcher PIV to Tom Seaver's 79,192.
Leads Cy Young 9 of 12 scored categories
Pitcher PIV edge Cy Young +62,206
Read the verdict ↓

Tom Seaver

Pitcher · 1967–1986
Wins
311
Losses
205
Strikeouts
3,640
ERA
2.86
WHIP
1.12
IP
4,782.2
View Tom Seaver's full profile →

Cy Young

Pitcher · 1890–1911
Wins
511
Losses
315
Strikeouts
2,803
ERA
2.63
WHIP
1.13
IP
7,356.0
View Cy Young's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 12 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 4 are counting totals on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded them. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 1960s and the 1890s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Tom Seaver vs Cy Young: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Tom Seaver Cy Young
Wins 311 Leads: 511
Losses not scored 205 315
Games 656 Leads: 906
Games Started 647 Leads: 815
Complete Games 231 Leads: 749
Shutouts 61 Leads: 76
Saves 1 Leads: 18
Strikeouts Leads: 3,640 2,803
Walks not scored 1,390 1,217
Hits Allowed not scored 3,971 7,092
Home Runs Allowed not scored 380 138
Innings Pitched 4,782.2 Leads: 7,356.0
ERA 2.86 Leads: 2.63
WHIP Leads: 1.12 1.13
K/9 Leads: 6.85 3.43
BB/9 2.62 Leads: 1.49

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Cy Young outpaces Tom Seaver 141,398 to 79,192 — driven by both sides of the ledger: 6,148 PIV per season to 3,600, across 23 seasons to 22. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Tom Seaver
79,192
Career Pitcher PIV · 3,600 per season (22 seasons)
Cy Young
141,398
Career Pitcher PIV · 6,148 per season (23 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).

Tom Seaver — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19711.76 ERA20-10, 289 K in 286 IP
19732.08 ERA19-10, 251 K in 290 IP
19682.20 ERA16-12, 205 K in 277 IP

Cy Young — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19081.26 ERA21-11, 150 K in 299 IP
19011.62 ERA33-10, 158 K in 371 IP
19051.82 ERA18-19, 210 K in 320 IP

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Cy Young leads in wins, ERA, and innings pitched, while Tom Seaver owns strikeouts, WHIP, and K/9. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Cy Young. PIV agrees: Cy Young grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Tom Seaver and Cy Young careers compare

Cy Young (1890–1911) was finished before Tom Seaver (1967–1986) arrived, so they never shared a league. The two careers are close in length, 656 games for Tom Seaver and 906 for Cy Young across 22 and 23 PIV seasons, so the totals compare on fairly even terms. Where Tom Seaver comes out ahead, it is in strikeouts (3,640 to 2,803), WHIP (1.12 to 1.13), and strikeouts per nine (6.85 to 3.43). By rate, Tom Seaver struck out 6.85 and walked 2.62 per nine innings; Cy Young struck out 3.43 and walked 1.49. Tom Seaver was mainly a starter (647 starts in 656 games), and Cy Young was mainly a starter (815 starts in 906 games).

Tom Seaver vs Cy Young: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Tom Seaver or Cy Young?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Cy Young leads Tom Seaver in 9 of the 12 scored categories.
Who had the better ERA?
Cy Young, with 2.63 to Tom Seaver's 2.86.
Who won more games?
Cy Young, with 511 to Tom Seaver's 311.
Who recorded more strikeouts?
Tom Seaver, with 3,640 to Cy Young's 2,803.
Who had the better WHIP?
Tom Seaver, with 1.12 to Cy Young's 1.13.

See These Players in Another Era