Mordecai Brown vs Eddie Plank: Career Stats Comparison

Eddie Plank has the better career line of the two, leading 5 of the 8 scored categories on this page (8 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Mordecai Brown played 1903–1916 as a pitcher; Eddie Plank played 1901–1917 as a pitcher.

ERA (Earned Run Average):
Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
W (Wins):
Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
SO (Strikeouts):
For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.

Data updated

Mordecai Brown (1903–1916) and Eddie Plank (1901–1917) — both debuted in the 1900s. Mordecai Brown finished with 239 wins and 1,375 strikeouts; Eddie Plank finished with 326 wins and 2,246 strikeouts. The table below sets out their careers line by line.

Quick answer

  • Who leads the career comparison? Eddie Plank, in 5 of the 8 scored categories.
  • Who had the better ERA? Mordecai Brown, with 2.06 to Eddie Plank's 2.35.
  • Who won more games? Eddie Plank, with 326 to Mordecai Brown's 239.
  • Who recorded more strikeouts? Eddie Plank, with 2,246 to Mordecai Brown's 1,375.
  • Who had the better WHIP? Mordecai Brown, with 1.07 to Eddie Plank's 1.12.
  • How many innings did each pitch? Mordecai Brown 3,172.1, Eddie Plank 4,495.2.
  • Who threw more shutouts? Eddie Plank, with 69 to Mordecai Brown's 55.
Leads Eddie Plank 5 of 8 scored categories
Pitcher PIV edge Eddie Plank +20,413
Read the verdict ↓

Mordecai Brown

Pitcher · 1903–1916
Wins
239
Losses
130
Strikeouts
1,375
ERA
2.06
WHIP
1.07
IP
3,172.1
View Mordecai Brown's full profile →

Eddie Plank

Pitcher · 1901–1917
Wins
326
Losses
194
Strikeouts
2,246
ERA
2.35
WHIP
1.12
IP
4,495.2
View Eddie Plank's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 8 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 8 are shown but not scored. Games, starts and innings measure playing time, and losses, walks and hits allowed track how long someone pitched, so they are left unmarked, as is any line where both players are at zero. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, so read them against the run environment each player worked in, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Mordecai Brown vs Eddie Plank: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Mordecai Brown Eddie Plank
Wins 239 Leads: 326
Losses not scored 130 194
Games not scored 481 623
Games Started not scored 332 529
Complete Games 271 Leads: 410
Shutouts 55 Leads: 69
Saves not scored 49 23
Strikeouts 1,375 Leads: 2,246
Walks not scored 673 1,072
Hits Allowed not scored 2,708 3,958
Home Runs Allowed not scored 43 42
Innings Pitched not scored 3,172.1 4,495.2
ERA Leads: 2.06 2.35
WHIP Leads: 1.07 1.12
K/9 3.90 Leads: 4.50
BB/9 Leads: 1.91 2.15

PIV Comparison

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Eddie Plank outpaces Mordecai Brown 51,914 to 31,501 — driven by both sides of the ledger: 3,054 PIV per season to 2,250, across 17 seasons to 14. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

Mordecai Brown
31,501
Career Pitcher PIV · 2,250 per season (14 seasons)
Eddie Plank
51,914
Career Pitcher PIV · 3,054 per season (17 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).

Mordecai Brown — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19061.04 ERA26-6, 144 K in 277 IP
19091.31 ERA27-9, 172 K in 342 IP
19071.39 ERA20-6, 107 K in 233 IP

Eddie Plank — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19091.76 ERA19-10, 132 K in 265 IP
19171.79 ERA5-6, 26 K in 131 IP
19102.01 ERA16-10, 123 K in 250 IP

Verdict

Eddie Plank leads 5 of the 8 scored categories on the head-to-head card: wins, complete games, shutouts, strikeouts, and others. Mordecai Brown leads 3: ERA, WHIP, and walks per nine. On the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Eddie Plank. PIV agrees: Eddie Plank grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Mordecai Brown and Eddie Plank careers compare

Mordecai Brown and Eddie Plank were active at the same time between 1903 and 1916. The two careers are close in length, 481 games for Mordecai Brown and 623 for Eddie Plank across 14 and 17 PIV seasons, so the totals compare on fairly even terms. Mordecai Brown's edges on the table are ERA (2.06 to 2.35), WHIP (1.07 to 1.12), and walks per nine (1.91 to 2.15). By rate, Mordecai Brown struck out 3.90 and walked 1.91 per nine innings; Eddie Plank struck out 4.50 and walked 2.15.

Mordecai Brown vs Eddie Plank: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Mordecai Brown or Eddie Plank?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Eddie Plank leads Mordecai Brown in 5 of the 8 scored categories.
Who had the better ERA?
Mordecai Brown, with 2.06 to Eddie Plank's 2.35.
Who won more games?
Eddie Plank, with 326 to Mordecai Brown's 239.
Who recorded more strikeouts?
Eddie Plank, with 2,246 to Mordecai Brown's 1,375.
Who had the better WHIP?
Mordecai Brown, with 1.07 to Eddie Plank's 1.12.

See These Players in Another Era