Pete Browning vs Tip O'Neill: Career Stats Comparison

Pete Browning has the better career line of the two, leading 9 of the 12 scored categories on this page (3 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Pete Browning played 1882–1894 as a hitter; Tip O'Neill played 1883–1892 as a hitter.

AVG (Batting Average):
Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
HR (Home Runs):
Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
RBI (Runs Batted In):
Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.

Data updated

Pete Browning (1882–1894) and Tip O'Neill (1883–1892) — both debuted in the 1880s. Pete Browning finished with 1,646 hits and 46 home runs; Tip O'Neill finished with 1,385 hits and 52 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.

Quick answer

  • Who leads the career comparison? Pete Browning, in 9 of the 12 scored categories.
  • Who hit more home runs? Tip O'Neill, with 52 to Pete Browning's 46.
  • Who had the higher OPS? Pete Browning, with .869 to Tip O'Neill's .851.
  • Who had the higher batting average? Pete Browning, with .341 to Tip O'Neill's .326.
  • Who had more hits? Pete Browning, with 1,646 to Tip O'Neill's 1,385.
  • Who drove in more runs? Tip O'Neill, with 757 to Pete Browning's 659.
  • Who has the higher career PIV? Pete Browning, with 28,876 career PIV to Tip O'Neill's 23,461.
Leads Pete Browning 9 of 12 scored categories
PIV edge Pete Browning +5,416
Read the verdict ↓

Pete Browning

Hitter · 1882–1894
Games
1,183
Hits
1,646
Home Runs
46
RBI
659
Avg
.341
OPS
.869
View Pete Browning's full profile →

Tip O'Neill

Hitter · 1883–1892
Games
1,052
Hits
1,385
Home Runs
52
RBI
757
Avg
.326
OPS
.851
View Tip O'Neill's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Pete Browning and Tip O'Neill. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. 12 of the 15 lines below are scored; the other 3 are shown but not scored. Games and at-bats measure playing time, strikeouts accumulate with a longer career, and a line where both players are at zero was won by neither, so those are left unmarked. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, so read them against the run environment each player worked in, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Pete Browning vs Tip O'Neill: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Pete Browning Tip O'Neill
Games not scored 1,183 1,052
At-Bats not scored 4,820 4,248
Runs Leads: 954 879
Hits Leads: 1,646 1,385
Doubles Leads: 295 222
Triples 85 Leads: 92
Home Runs 46 Leads: 52
RBI 659 Leads: 757
Walks Leads: 466 420
Strikeouts not scored 245 194
Stolen Bases Leads: 258 161
Batting Avg Leads: .341 .326
On-Base % Leads: .403 .392
Slugging % Leads: .467 .458
OPS Leads: .869 .851

PIV Comparison

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Pete Browning leads Tip O'Neill 28,876 to 23,461 — a longevity gap rather than a per-season one: Pete Browning played 13 seasons to Tip O'Neill's 10, while Tip O'Neill carries the higher per-season figure (2,346 to 2,221). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

Pete Browning
28,876
Career PIV · 2,221 per season (13 seasons)
Tip O'Neill
23,461
Career PIV · 2,346 per season (10 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).

Pete Browning — top 3 seasons by OPS

18871.011 OPS4 HR, 118 RBI, .402 avg
1890.976 OPS5 HR, 93 RBI, .373 avg
1885.923 OPS9 HR, 73 RBI, .362 avg

Tip O'Neill — top 3 seasons by OPS

18871.180 OPS14 HR, 123 RBI, .435 avg
1889.897 OPS9 HR, 110 RBI, .335 avg
1891.855 OPS10 HR, 95 RBI, .323 avg

Verdict

Pete Browning leads 9 of the 12 scored categories on the head-to-head card: runs, hits, doubles, walks, and others. Tip O'Neill leads 3: triples, home runs, and RBI. On the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Pete Browning. PIV agrees: Pete Browning grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Pete Browning and Tip O'Neill careers compare

From 1883 through 1892, Pete Browning and Tip O'Neill were in the majors together. The two careers are close in length, 1,183 games for Pete Browning and 1,052 for Tip O'Neill across 13 and 10 PIV seasons, so the totals compare on fairly even terms. Where Tip O'Neill comes out ahead, it is in triples (92 to 85), home runs (52 to 46), and RBI (757 to 659). Pete Browning walked more often than struck out (466 walks, 245 strikeouts); Tip O'Neill walked more often than struck out (420 walks, 194 strikeouts). Home runs make up a larger share of Tip O'Neill's hits: 46 of 1,646 for Pete Browning, 52 of 1,385 for Tip O'Neill.

Pete Browning vs Tip O'Neill: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Pete Browning or Tip O'Neill?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Pete Browning leads Tip O'Neill in 9 of the 12 scored categories.
Did Pete Browning or Tip O'Neill hit more home runs?
Tip O'Neill, with 52 to Pete Browning's 46.
Who had the higher OPS?
Pete Browning, with .869 to Tip O'Neill's .851.
Who had the higher batting average?
Pete Browning, with .341 to Tip O'Neill's .326.
Who had more hits?
Pete Browning, with 1,646 to Tip O'Neill's 1,385.