Tip O'Neill vs Jim O'Rourke: Career Stats Comparison
Jim O'Rourke has the better career line of the two, leading 10 of the 14 statistical categories compared on this page. Tip O'Neill played 1883–1892 as a hitter; Jim O'Rourke played 1872–1904 as a hitter.
- AVG (Batting Average):
- Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
- HR (Home Runs):
- Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
- RBI (Runs Batted In):
- Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
- OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
- On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.
Data updated
Tip O'Neill (1883–1892) and Jim O'Rourke (1872–1904) — they broke in during the 1880s and the 1870s respectively, which makes the side-by-side worth doing carefully. Tip O'Neill finished with 1,385 hits and 52 home runs; Jim O'Rourke finished with 2,639 hits and 62 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.
Quick answer
- Who hit more home runs? Jim O'Rourke, with 62 to Tip O'Neill's 52.
- Who had the higher OPS? Tip O'Neill, with .851 to Jim O'Rourke's .775.
- Who had the higher batting average? Tip O'Neill, with .326 to Jim O'Rourke's .310.
- Who had more hits? Jim O'Rourke, with 2,639 to Tip O'Neill's 1,385.
- Who drove in more runs? Jim O'Rourke, with 1,208 to Tip O'Neill's 757.
- Who has the higher career PIV? Jim O'Rourke, with 29,906 career PIV to Tip O'Neill's 23,461.
- Who won more championships? Jim O'Rourke, with 2 World Series titles to Tip O'Neill's 1.
Tip O'Neill
Jim O'Rourke
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Tip O'Neill and Jim O'Rourke. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted -- a .305 in 1965 and a .298 in 2001 came out of very different run environments -- so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.
| Statistic | Tip O'Neill | Jim O'Rourke |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 1,052 | Leads: 1,999 |
| At-Bats | 4,248 | Leads: 8,503 |
| Runs | 879 | Leads: 1,729 |
| Hits | 1,385 | Leads: 2,639 |
| Doubles | 222 | Leads: 468 |
| Triples | 92 | Leads: 149 |
| Home Runs | 52 | Leads: 62 |
| RBI | 757 | Leads: 1,208 |
| Walks | 420 | Leads: 513 |
| Strikeouts | 194 | 362 |
| Stolen Bases | 161 | Leads: 229 |
| Batting Avg | Leads: .326 | .310 |
| On-Base % | Leads: .392 | .352 |
| Slugging % | Leads: .458 | .422 |
| OPS | Leads: .851 | .775 |
PIV Comparison
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Jim O'Rourke leads Tip O'Neill 29,906 to 23,461 — a gap driven primarily by per-season impact (1,300 vs 2,346 per year). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).
Tip O'Neill — top 3 seasons by OPS
Jim O'Rourke — top 3 seasons by OPS
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Jim O'Rourke leads in hits, home runs, RBI, and runs, while Tip O'Neill owns batting average, OBP, and OPS. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Jim O'Rourke. PIV agrees: Jim O'Rourke grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.
Related Matchups
Tip O'Neill vs Jim O'Rourke: Frequently Asked Questions
- Who was better, Tip O'Neill or Jim O'Rourke?
- By the career statistics compared on this page, Jim O'Rourke leads Tip O'Neill in 10 of 14 categories.
- Did Tip O'Neill or Jim O'Rourke hit more home runs?
- Jim O'Rourke, with 62 to Tip O'Neill's 52.
- Who had the higher OPS?
- Tip O'Neill, with .851 to Jim O'Rourke's .775.
- Who had the higher batting average?
- Tip O'Neill, with .326 to Jim O'Rourke's .310.
- Who had more hits?
- Jim O'Rourke, with 2,639 to Tip O'Neill's 1,385.