Sam Crawford vs Ed Delahanty: Career Stats Comparison
Ed Delahanty has the better career line of the two, leading 8 of the 14 statistical categories compared on this page. Sam Crawford played 1899–1917 as a hitter; Ed Delahanty played 1888–1903 as a hitter.
- AVG (Batting Average):
- Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
- HR (Home Runs):
- Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
- RBI (Runs Batted In):
- Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
- OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
- On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.
Data updated
Sam Crawford (1899–1917) and Ed Delahanty (1888–1903) — they broke in during the 1890s and the 1880s respectively, which makes the side-by-side worth doing carefully. Sam Crawford finished with 2,961 hits and 97 home runs; Ed Delahanty finished with 2,597 hits and 101 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.
Quick answer
- Who hit more home runs? Ed Delahanty, with 101 to Sam Crawford's 97.
- Who had the higher OPS? Ed Delahanty, with .917 to Sam Crawford's .814.
- Who had the higher batting average? Ed Delahanty, with .346 to Sam Crawford's .309.
- Who had more hits? Sam Crawford, with 2,961 to Ed Delahanty's 2,597.
- Who drove in more runs? Sam Crawford, with 1,519 to Ed Delahanty's 1,466.
- Who has the higher career PIV? Ed Delahanty, with 44,188 career PIV to Sam Crawford's 41,381.
Sam Crawford
Ed Delahanty
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Sam Crawford and Ed Delahanty. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted -- a .305 in 1965 and a .298 in 2001 came out of very different run environments -- so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.
| Statistic | Sam Crawford | Ed Delahanty |
|---|---|---|
| Games | Leads: 2,517 | 1,837 |
| At-Bats | Leads: 9,570 | 7,510 |
| Runs | 1,391 | Leads: 1,600 |
| Hits | Leads: 2,961 | 2,597 |
| Doubles | 458 | Leads: 522 |
| Triples | Leads: 309 | 186 |
| Home Runs | 97 | Leads: 101 |
| RBI | Leads: 1,519 | 1,466 |
| Walks | Leads: 760 | 742 |
| Strikeouts | 580 | 439 |
| Stolen Bases | 366 | Leads: 456 |
| Batting Avg | .309 | Leads: .346 |
| On-Base % | .362 | Leads: .411 |
| Slugging % | .452 | Leads: .505 |
| OPS | .814 | Leads: .917 |
PIV Comparison
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Ed Delahanty edges Sam Crawford 44,188 to 41,381 — a gap driven primarily by per-season impact (2,762 vs 2,178 per year). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).
Sam Crawford — top 3 seasons by OPS
Ed Delahanty — top 3 seasons by OPS
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Ed Delahanty leads in home runs, runs, stolen bases, and batting average, while Sam Crawford owns hits and RBI. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Ed Delahanty. PIV agrees: Ed Delahanty grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.
Related Matchups
Sam Crawford vs Ed Delahanty: Frequently Asked Questions
- Who was better, Sam Crawford or Ed Delahanty?
- By the career statistics compared on this page, Ed Delahanty leads Sam Crawford in 8 of 14 categories.
- Did Sam Crawford or Ed Delahanty hit more home runs?
- Ed Delahanty, with 101 to Sam Crawford's 97.
- Who had the higher OPS?
- Ed Delahanty, with .917 to Sam Crawford's .814.
- Who had the higher batting average?
- Ed Delahanty, with .346 to Sam Crawford's .309.
- Who had more hits?
- Sam Crawford, with 2,961 to Ed Delahanty's 2,597.