Jacob deGrom vs Max Scherzer: Career Stats Comparison
Max Scherzer has the better career line of the two, leading 7 of the 11 statistical categories compared on this page. Jacob deGrom has played 2014–present as a pitcher; Max Scherzer has played 2008–present as a pitcher.
- ERA (Earned Run Average):
- Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
- W (Wins):
- Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
- SO (Strikeouts):
- For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
- WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
- Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.
Data updated
Jacob deGrom (2014–present) and Max Scherzer (2008–present) — breaking in during the 2010s and the 2000s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. Jacob deGrom compiled 96 wins and 1,851 strikeouts; Max Scherzer put up 221 wins and 3,489 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.
Quick answer
- Who had the better ERA? Jacob deGrom, with 2.57 to Max Scherzer's 3.22.
- Who won more games? Max Scherzer, with 221 to Jacob deGrom's 96.
- Who recorded more strikeouts? Max Scherzer, with 3,489 to Jacob deGrom's 1,851.
- Who had the better WHIP? Jacob deGrom, with 0.99 to Max Scherzer's 1.08.
- Who pitched more innings? Max Scherzer, with 2,963 to Jacob deGrom's 1,539.
- Who threw more shutouts? Max Scherzer, with 5 to Jacob deGrom's 2.
- Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Max Scherzer, with 68,491 career Pitcher PIV to Jacob deGrom's 58,656.
Jacob deGrom
Max Scherzer
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted: compare them with the era in mind, or use the PIV card below, which is.
| Statistic | Jacob deGrom | Max Scherzer |
|---|---|---|
| Wins | 96 | Leads: 221 |
| Losses | 65 | 117 |
| Games | 248 | Leads: 483 |
| Games Started | 248 | Leads: 474 |
| Complete Games | 4 | Leads: 12 |
| Shutouts | 2 | Leads: 5 |
| Saves | 0 | 0 |
| Strikeouts | 1,851 | Leads: 3,489 |
| Walks | 345 | 779 |
| Hits Allowed | 1,173 | 2,433 |
| Home Runs Allowed | 146 | 354 |
| Innings Pitched | 1,539 | Leads: 2,963 |
| ERA | Leads: 2.57 | 3.22 |
| WHIP | Leads: 0.99 | 1.08 |
| K/9 | Leads: 10.82 | 10.60 |
| BB/9 | Leads: 2.02 | 2.37 |
PIV Comparison
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Max Scherzer leads Jacob deGrom 68,491 to 58,656 — a gap driven primarily by per-season impact (3,425 vs 4,888 per year). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).
Jacob deGrom — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Max Scherzer — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Max Scherzer leads in wins, strikeouts, and innings pitched, while Jacob deGrom owns ERA, WHIP, and K/9. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Max Scherzer. PIV agrees: Max Scherzer grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.
Related Matchups
Jacob deGrom vs Max Scherzer: Frequently Asked Questions
- Who was better, Jacob deGrom or Max Scherzer?
- By the career statistics compared on this page, Max Scherzer leads Jacob deGrom in 7 of 11 categories.
- Who had the better ERA?
- Jacob deGrom, with 2.57 to Max Scherzer's 3.22.
- Who won more games?
- Max Scherzer, with 221 to Jacob deGrom's 96.
- Who recorded more strikeouts?
- Max Scherzer, with 3,489 to Jacob deGrom's 1,851.
- Who had the better WHIP?
- Jacob deGrom, with 0.99 to Max Scherzer's 1.08.