Jesse Haines vs Christy Mathewson: Career Stats Comparison

Christy Mathewson has the better career line of the two, leading 12 of the 12 scored categories on this page (4 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Jesse Haines played 1918–1937 as a pitcher; Christy Mathewson played 1900–1916 as a pitcher.

ERA (Earned Run Average):
Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
W (Wins):
Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
SO (Strikeouts):
For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.

Data updated

Jesse Haines (1918–1937) and Christy Mathewson (1900–1916) — breaking in during the 1910s and the 1900s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. Jesse Haines finished with 210 wins and 981 strikeouts; Christy Mathewson finished with 373 wins and 2,507 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.

Quick answer

  • Who had the better ERA? Christy Mathewson, with 2.13 to Jesse Haines's 3.64.
  • Who won more games? Christy Mathewson, with 373 to Jesse Haines's 210.
  • Who recorded more strikeouts? Christy Mathewson, with 2,507 to Jesse Haines's 981.
  • Who had the better WHIP? Christy Mathewson, with 1.06 to Jesse Haines's 1.35.
  • Who pitched more innings? Christy Mathewson, with 4,788.2 to Jesse Haines's 3,208.2.
  • Who threw more shutouts? Christy Mathewson, with 79 to Jesse Haines's 24.
  • Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Christy Mathewson, with 82,446 career Pitcher PIV to Jesse Haines's 5,624.
Leads Christy Mathewson 12 of 12 scored categories
Pitcher PIV edge Christy Mathewson +76,822
Read the verdict ↓

Jesse Haines

Pitcher · 1918–1937
Wins
210
Losses
158
Strikeouts
981
ERA
3.64
WHIP
1.35
IP
3,208.2
View Jesse Haines's full profile →

Christy Mathewson

Pitcher · 1900–1916
Wins
373
Losses
188
Strikeouts
2,507
ERA
2.13
WHIP
1.06
IP
4,788.2
View Christy Mathewson's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 12 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 4 are counting totals on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded them. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 1910s and the 1900s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Jesse Haines vs Christy Mathewson: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Jesse Haines Christy Mathewson
Wins 210 Leads: 373
Losses not scored 158 188
Games 555 Leads: 636
Games Started 388 Leads: 552
Complete Games 208 Leads: 435
Shutouts 24 Leads: 79
Saves 10 Leads: 29
Strikeouts 981 Leads: 2,507
Walks not scored 871 848
Hits Allowed not scored 3,460 4,219
Home Runs Allowed not scored 165 90
Innings Pitched 3,208.2 Leads: 4,788.2
ERA 3.64 Leads: 2.13
WHIP 1.35 Leads: 1.06
K/9 2.75 Leads: 4.71
BB/9 2.44 Leads: 1.59

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Christy Mathewson outpaces Jesse Haines 82,446 to 5,624 — driven by per-season impact — 4,580 PIV per season to 296 — rather than by longevity, since Christy Mathewson played 18 seasons to Jesse Haines's 19. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Jesse Haines
5,624
Career Pitcher PIV · 296 per season (19 seasons)
Christy Mathewson
82,446
Career Pitcher PIV · 4,580 per season (18 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).

Jesse Haines — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19272.72 ERA24-10, 89 K in 300 IP
19202.98 ERA13-20, 120 K in 301 IP
19313.02 ERA12-3, 27 K in 122 IP

Christy Mathewson — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19091.14 ERA25-6, 149 K in 275 IP
19051.28 ERA31-9, 206 K in 338 IP
19081.43 ERA37-11, 259 K in 390 IP

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Christy Mathewson leads in wins, strikeouts, ERA, and WHIP, while Jesse Haines owns no headline categories. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Christy Mathewson. PIV agrees: Christy Mathewson grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Jesse Haines and Christy Mathewson careers compare

No season is shared: Christy Mathewson played 1900–1916, Jesse Haines 1918–1937. The two careers are close in length, 555 games for Jesse Haines and 636 for Christy Mathewson across 19 and 18 PIV seasons, so the totals compare on fairly even terms. Every scored category on the table goes to Christy Mathewson. By rate, Jesse Haines struck out 2.75 and walked 2.44 per nine innings; Christy Mathewson struck out 4.71 and walked 1.59. Jesse Haines split time between starting and relief (388 starts in 555 games), while Christy Mathewson was mainly a starter (552 starts in 636 games). In WHIP, Christy Mathewson's 1.06 beats Jesse Haines's 1.35.

Jesse Haines vs Christy Mathewson: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Jesse Haines or Christy Mathewson?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Christy Mathewson leads Jesse Haines in 12 of the 12 scored categories.
Who had the better ERA?
Christy Mathewson, with 2.13 to Jesse Haines's 3.64.
Who won more games?
Christy Mathewson, with 373 to Jesse Haines's 210.
Who recorded more strikeouts?
Christy Mathewson, with 2,507 to Jesse Haines's 981.
Who had the better WHIP?
Christy Mathewson, with 1.06 to Jesse Haines's 1.35.

See These Players in Another Era