Walter Johnson vs Justin Verlander: Career Stats Comparison
Walter Johnson has the better career line of the two, leading 10 of the 12 scored categories on this page (4 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Walter Johnson played 1907–1927 as a pitcher; Justin Verlander has played 2005–present as a pitcher.
- ERA (Earned Run Average):
- Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
- W (Wins):
- Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
- SO (Strikeouts):
- For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
- WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
- Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.
Data updated
Walter Johnson (1907–1927) and Justin Verlander (2005–present) — breaking in during the 1900s and the 2000s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. Walter Johnson finished with 417 wins and 3,509 strikeouts; Justin Verlander has 266 wins and 3,560 strikeouts through October 12, 2026. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.
Quick answer
- Who had the better ERA? Walter Johnson, with 2.17 to Justin Verlander's 3.33.
- Who won more games? Walter Johnson, with 417 to Justin Verlander's 266.
- Who recorded more strikeouts? Justin Verlander, with 3,560 to Walter Johnson's 3,509.
- Who had the better WHIP? Walter Johnson, with 1.06 to Justin Verlander's 1.14.
- Who pitched more innings? Walter Johnson, with 5,914.2 to Justin Verlander's 3,576.2.
- Who threw more shutouts? Walter Johnson, with 110 to Justin Verlander's 9.
- Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Walter Johnson, with 124,021 career Pitcher PIV to Justin Verlander's 68,171.
Walter Johnson
Justin Verlander
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 12 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 4 are counting totals on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded them. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 1900s and the 2000s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.
Justin Verlander is still active — his totals below are current through October 12, 2026.
| Statistic | Walter Johnson | Justin Verlander |
|---|---|---|
| Wins | Leads: 417 | 266 |
| Losses not scored | 279 | 159 |
| Games | Leads: 802 | 557 |
| Games Started | Leads: 666 | 557 |
| Complete Games | Leads: 531 | 26 |
| Shutouts | Leads: 110 | 9 |
| Saves | Leads: 34 | 0 |
| Strikeouts | 3,509 | Leads: 3,560 |
| Walks not scored | 1,363 | 1,007 |
| Hits Allowed not scored | 4,913 | 3,057 |
| Home Runs Allowed not scored | 97 | 374 |
| Innings Pitched | Leads: 5,914.2 | 3,576.2 |
| ERA | Leads: 2.17 | 3.33 |
| WHIP | Leads: 1.06 | 1.14 |
| K/9 | 5.34 | Leads: 8.96 |
| BB/9 | Leads: 2.07 | 2.53 |
PIV Comparison through 2025
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Walter Johnson outpaces Justin Verlander 124,021 to 68,171 — driven by per-season impact — 5,906 PIV per season to 3,099 — rather than by longevity, since Walter Johnson played 21 seasons to Justin Verlander's 22. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).
Walter Johnson — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Justin Verlander — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Walter Johnson leads in wins, ERA, WHIP, and innings pitched, while Justin Verlander owns strikeouts and K/9. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Walter Johnson. PIV agrees: Walter Johnson grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.
Related Matchups
How the Walter Johnson and Justin Verlander careers compare
The two careers never overlapped: Walter Johnson's ended in 1927, and Justin Verlander debuted in 2005. The two careers are close in length, 802 games for Walter Johnson and 557 for Justin Verlander across 21 and 22 PIV seasons, so the totals compare on fairly even terms. Justin Verlander's edges on the table are strikeouts (3,560 to 3,509) and strikeouts per nine (8.96 to 5.34). The per-nine rows read 5.34 strikeouts and 2.07 walks for Walter Johnson, 8.96 and 2.53 for Justin Verlander. Walter Johnson was mainly a starter (666 starts in 802 games), and Justin Verlander was mainly a starter (557 starts in 557 games). Because Justin Verlander is still playing, the totals above will keep moving through the season.
Walter Johnson vs Justin Verlander: Frequently Asked Questions
- Who was better, Walter Johnson or Justin Verlander?
- By the career statistics compared on this page, Walter Johnson leads Justin Verlander in 10 of the 12 scored categories.
- Who had the better ERA?
- Walter Johnson, with 2.17 to Justin Verlander's 3.33.
- Who won more games?
- Walter Johnson, with 417 to Justin Verlander's 266.
- Who recorded more strikeouts?
- Justin Verlander, with 3,560 to Walter Johnson's 3,509.
- Who had the better WHIP?
- Walter Johnson, with 1.06 to Justin Verlander's 1.14.