Harmon Killebrew vs Enos Slaughter: Career Stats Comparison

Harmon Killebrew has the better career line of the two, leading 8 of the 14 scored categories on this page (1 further counting total is shown but not scored). Harmon Killebrew played 1954–1975 as a hitter; Enos Slaughter played 1938–1959 as a hitter.

AVG (Batting Average):
Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
HR (Home Runs):
Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
RBI (Runs Batted In):
Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.

Data updated

Harmon Killebrew (1954–1975) and Enos Slaughter (1938–1959) — they broke in during the 1950s and the 1930s respectively, which makes the side-by-side worth doing carefully. Harmon Killebrew finished with 2,086 hits and 573 home runs; Enos Slaughter finished with 2,383 hits and 169 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.

Quick answer

  • Who hit more home runs? Harmon Killebrew, with 573 to Enos Slaughter's 169.
  • Who had the higher OPS? Harmon Killebrew, with .884 to Enos Slaughter's .834.
  • Who had the higher batting average? Enos Slaughter, with .300 to Harmon Killebrew's .256.
  • Who had more hits? Enos Slaughter, with 2,383 to Harmon Killebrew's 2,086.
  • Who drove in more runs? Harmon Killebrew, with 1,584 to Enos Slaughter's 1,304.
  • Who has the higher career PIV? Harmon Killebrew, with 48,240 career PIV to Enos Slaughter's 27,340.
  • Who won more championships? Enos Slaughter, with 4 World Series titles to Harmon Killebrew's 0.
Leads Harmon Killebrew 8 of 14 scored categories
PIV edge Harmon Killebrew +20,900
Read the verdict ↓

Harmon Killebrew

Hitter · 1954–1975
Games
2,435
Hits
2,086
Home Runs
573
RBI
1,584
Avg
.256
OPS
.884
View Harmon Killebrew's full profile →

Enos Slaughter

Hitter · 1938–1959
Games
2,380
Hits
2,383
Home Runs
169
RBI
1,304
Avg
.300
OPS
.834
View Enos Slaughter's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Harmon Killebrew and Enos Slaughter. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. 14 of the 15 lines below are scored; the other one is a counting total on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded it. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 1950s and the 1930s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Harmon Killebrew vs Enos Slaughter: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Harmon Killebrew Enos Slaughter
Games Leads: 2,435 2,380
At-Bats Leads: 8,147 7,946
Runs Leads: 1,283 1,247
Hits 2,086 Leads: 2,383
Doubles 290 Leads: 413
Triples 24 Leads: 148
Home Runs Leads: 573 169
RBI Leads: 1,584 1,304
Walks Leads: 1,559 1,018
Strikeouts not scored 1,699 538
Stolen Bases 19 Leads: 71
Batting Avg .256 Leads: .300
On-Base % .376 Leads: .382
Slugging % Leads: .509 .453
OPS Leads: .884 .834

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Harmon Killebrew outpaces Enos Slaughter 48,240 to 27,340 — driven by per-season impact — 2,193 PIV per season to 1,243 — rather than by longevity, since Harmon Killebrew played 22 seasons to Enos Slaughter's 22. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Harmon Killebrew
48,240
Career PIV · 2,193 per season (22 seasons)
Enos Slaughter
27,340
Career PIV · 1,243 per season (22 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).

Harmon Killebrew — top 3 seasons by OPS

19611.012 OPS46 HR, 122 RBI, .288 avg
19691.011 OPS49 HR, 140 RBI, .276 avg
1967.965 OPS44 HR, 113 RBI, .269 avg

Enos Slaughter — top 3 seasons by OPS

1949.929 OPS13 HR, 96 RBI, .336 avg
1942.906 OPS13 HR, 98 RBI, .318 avg
1941.886 OPS13 HR, 76 RBI, .311 avg

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Harmon Killebrew leads in home runs, RBI, runs, and OPS, while Enos Slaughter owns hits, stolen bases, and batting average. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Harmon Killebrew. PIV agrees: Harmon Killebrew grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Harmon Killebrew and Enos Slaughter careers compare

Harmon Killebrew and Enos Slaughter were active at the same time between 1954 and 1959. With 2,435 games against 2,380 across 22 and 22 PIV seasons, neither player's totals owe much to extra seasons. Plate discipline differs: Harmon Killebrew struck out more than walked (1,699 to 1,559), but Enos Slaughter walked more often than struck out (1,018 walks, 538 strikeouts). Harmon Killebrew is the more power-leaning hitter, with 573 of 2,086 hits leaving the park. Harmon Killebrew's slugging percentage of .509 tops Enos Slaughter's .453. Harmon Killebrew owns the better peak by OPS: 1.012 OPS in 1961 for Harmon Killebrew against .929 OPS in 1949 for Enos Slaughter.

Harmon Killebrew vs Enos Slaughter: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Harmon Killebrew or Enos Slaughter?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Harmon Killebrew leads Enos Slaughter in 8 of the 14 scored categories.
Did Harmon Killebrew or Enos Slaughter hit more home runs?
Harmon Killebrew, with 573 to Enos Slaughter's 169.
Who had the higher OPS?
Harmon Killebrew, with .884 to Enos Slaughter's .834.
Who had the higher batting average?
Enos Slaughter, with .300 to Harmon Killebrew's .256.
Who had more hits?
Enos Slaughter, with 2,383 to Harmon Killebrew's 2,086.

See These Players in Another Era