Christy Mathewson vs Ed Walsh: Career Stats Comparison

Christy Mathewson has the better career line of the two, leading 8 of the 12 statistical categories compared on this page. Christy Mathewson played 1900–1916 as a pitcher; Ed Walsh played 1904–1917 as a pitcher.

ERA (Earned Run Average):
Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
W (Wins):
Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
SO (Strikeouts):
For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.

Data updated

Christy Mathewson (1900–1916) and Ed Walsh (1904–1917) — both came up during the 1900s, so the matchup is a direct one. Christy Mathewson compiled 373 wins and 2,507 strikeouts; Ed Walsh put up 195 wins and 1,736 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.

Quick answer

  • Who had the better ERA? Ed Walsh, with 1.82 to Christy Mathewson's 2.13.
  • Who won more games? Christy Mathewson, with 373 to Ed Walsh's 195.
  • Who recorded more strikeouts? Christy Mathewson, with 2,507 to Ed Walsh's 1,736.
  • Who had the better WHIP? Ed Walsh, with 1.00 to Christy Mathewson's 1.06.
  • Who pitched more innings? Christy Mathewson, with 4,788 to Ed Walsh's 2,964.
  • Who threw more shutouts? Christy Mathewson, with 79 to Ed Walsh's 57.
  • Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Christy Mathewson, with 82,446 career Pitcher PIV to Ed Walsh's 62,631.
Leads Christy Mathewson 8 of 12 awarded categories
Pitcher PIV edge Christy Mathewson +19,815
Read the verdict ↓

Christy Mathewson

Pitcher · 1900–1916
Wins
373
Losses
188
Strikeouts
2,507
ERA
2.13
WHIP
1.06
IP
4,788
View Christy Mathewson's full profile →

Ed Walsh

Pitcher · 1904–1917
Wins
195
Losses
126
Strikeouts
1,736
ERA
1.82
WHIP
1.00
IP
2,964
View Ed Walsh's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted: compare them with the era in mind, or use the PIV card below, which is.

Christy Mathewson vs Ed Walsh: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Christy Mathewson Ed Walsh
Wins Leads: 373 195
Losses 188 126
Games Leads: 636 430
Games Started Leads: 552 315
Complete Games Leads: 435 250
Shutouts Leads: 79 57
Saves 29 Leads: 35
Strikeouts Leads: 2,507 1,736
Walks 848 617
Hits Allowed 4,219 2,346
Home Runs Allowed 90 23
Innings Pitched Leads: 4,788 2,964
ERA 2.13 Leads: 1.82
WHIP 1.06 Leads: 1.00
K/9 4.71 Leads: 5.27
BB/9 Leads: 1.59 1.87

PIV Comparison

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Christy Mathewson leads Ed Walsh 82,446 to 62,631 — a gap driven primarily by per-season impact (4,580 vs 4,474 per year). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

Christy Mathewson
82,446
Career Pitcher PIV · 4,580 per season (18 seasons)
Ed Walsh
62,631
Career Pitcher PIV · 4,474 per season (14 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).

Christy Mathewson — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19091.14 ERA25-6, 149 K in 275 IP
19051.28 ERA31-9, 206 K in 338 IP
19081.43 ERA37-11, 259 K in 390 IP

Ed Walsh — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19101.27 ERA18-20, 258 K in 369 IP
19091.41 ERA15-11, 127 K in 230 IP
19081.42 ERA40-15, 269 K in 464 IP

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Christy Mathewson leads in wins, strikeouts, and innings pitched, while Ed Walsh owns ERA, WHIP, and K/9. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Christy Mathewson. PIV agrees: Christy Mathewson grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

Christy Mathewson vs Ed Walsh: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Christy Mathewson or Ed Walsh?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Christy Mathewson leads Ed Walsh in 8 of 12 categories.
Who had the better ERA?
Ed Walsh, with 1.82 to Christy Mathewson's 2.13.
Who won more games?
Christy Mathewson, with 373 to Ed Walsh's 195.
Who recorded more strikeouts?
Christy Mathewson, with 2,507 to Ed Walsh's 1,736.
Who had the better WHIP?
Ed Walsh, with 1.00 to Christy Mathewson's 1.06.

See These Players in Another Era