Joe Medwick vs Giancarlo Stanton: Career Stats Comparison

Joe Medwick has the better career line of the two, leading 9 of the 14 scored categories on this page (1 further counting total is shown but not scored). Joe Medwick played 1932–1948 as a hitter; Giancarlo Stanton has played 2010–present as a hitter.

AVG (Batting Average):
Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
HR (Home Runs):
Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
RBI (Runs Batted In):
Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.

Data updated

Joe Medwick (1932–1948) and Giancarlo Stanton (2010–present) — they broke in during the 1930s and the 2010s respectively, which makes the side-by-side worth doing carefully. Joe Medwick finished with 2,471 hits and 205 home runs; Giancarlo Stanton has 1,642 hits and 456 home runs through October 12, 2026. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.

Quick answer

  • Who hit more home runs? Giancarlo Stanton, with 456 to Joe Medwick's 205.
  • Who had the higher OPS? Giancarlo Stanton, with .871 to Joe Medwick's .867.
  • Who had the higher batting average? Joe Medwick, with .324 to Giancarlo Stanton's .258.
  • Who had more hits? Joe Medwick, with 2,471 to Giancarlo Stanton's 1,642.
  • Who drove in more runs? Joe Medwick, with 1,383 to Giancarlo Stanton's 1,183.
  • Who has the higher career PIV? Joe Medwick, with 28,897 career PIV to Giancarlo Stanton's 25,656.
  • Who won more championships? Joe Medwick, with 1 World Series title to Giancarlo Stanton's 0.
Leads Joe Medwick 9 of 14 scored categories
PIV edge Joe Medwick +3,242
Read the verdict ↓

Joe Medwick

Hitter · 1932–1948
Games
1,984
Hits
2,471
Home Runs
205
RBI
1,383
Avg
.324
OPS
.867
View Joe Medwick's full profile →

Giancarlo Stanton

Hitter · 2010–present
Games
1,750
Hits
1,642
Home Runs
456
RBI
1,183
Avg
.258
OPS
.871
View Giancarlo Stanton's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Joe Medwick and Giancarlo Stanton. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. 14 of the 15 lines below are scored; the other one is a counting total on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded it. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 1930s and the 2010s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Giancarlo Stanton is still active — his totals below are current through October 12, 2026.

Joe Medwick vs Giancarlo Stanton: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Joe Medwick Giancarlo Stanton
Games Leads: 1,984 1,750
At-Bats Leads: 7,635 6,364
Runs Leads: 1,198 951
Hits Leads: 2,471 1,642
Doubles Leads: 540 319
Triples Leads: 113 11
Home Runs 205 Leads: 456
RBI Leads: 1,383 1,183
Walks 437 Leads: 811
Strikeouts not scored 551 2,088
Stolen Bases 42 Leads: 43
Batting Avg Leads: .324 .258
On-Base % Leads: .362 .345
Slugging % .505 Leads: .527
OPS .867 Leads: .871

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Joe Medwick leads Giancarlo Stanton 28,897 to 25,656 — a longevity gap rather than a per-season one: Joe Medwick played 20 seasons to Giancarlo Stanton's 16, while Giancarlo Stanton carries the higher per-season figure (1,603 to 1,445). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Joe Medwick
28,897
Career PIV · 1,445 per season (20 seasons)
Giancarlo Stanton
25,656
Career PIV · 1,603 per season (16 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).

Joe Medwick — top 3 seasons by OPS

19371.056 OPS31 HR, 154 RBI, .374 avg
1936.964 OPS18 HR, 138 RBI, .351 avg
1935.962 OPS23 HR, 126 RBI, .353 avg

Giancarlo Stanton — top 3 seasons by OPS

20171.007 OPS59 HR, 132 RBI, .281 avg
2012.969 OPS37 HR, 86 RBI, .290 avg
2014.950 OPS37 HR, 105 RBI, .288 avg

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Joe Medwick leads in hits, RBI, runs, and batting average, while Giancarlo Stanton owns home runs, stolen bases, and OPS. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Joe Medwick. PIV agrees: Joe Medwick grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Joe Medwick and Giancarlo Stanton careers compare

The two careers never overlapped: Joe Medwick's ended in 1948, and Giancarlo Stanton debuted in 2010. The two careers are close in length, 1,984 games for Joe Medwick and 1,750 for Giancarlo Stanton across 20 and 16 PIV seasons, so the totals compare on fairly even terms. Joe Medwick struck out more than walked (551 to 437); Giancarlo Stanton struck out more than walked (2,088 to 811). Giancarlo Stanton is the more power-leaning hitter, with 456 of 1,642 hits leaving the park. Giancarlo Stanton's slugging percentage of .527 tops Joe Medwick's .505. Giancarlo Stanton's numbers are live and update with each game, so the comparison is a snapshot.

Joe Medwick vs Giancarlo Stanton: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Joe Medwick or Giancarlo Stanton?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Joe Medwick leads Giancarlo Stanton in 9 of the 14 scored categories.
Did Joe Medwick or Giancarlo Stanton hit more home runs?
Giancarlo Stanton, with 456 to Joe Medwick's 205.
Who had the higher OPS?
Giancarlo Stanton, with .871 to Joe Medwick's .867.
Who had the higher batting average?
Joe Medwick, with .324 to Giancarlo Stanton's .258.
Who had more hits?
Joe Medwick, with 2,471 to Giancarlo Stanton's 1,642.