Jim Palmer vs Tom Seaver: Career Stats Comparison

Tom Seaver has the better career line of the two, leading 10 of the 12 scored categories on this page (4 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Jim Palmer played 1965–1984 as a pitcher; Tom Seaver played 1967–1986 as a pitcher.

ERA (Earned Run Average):
Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
W (Wins):
Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
SO (Strikeouts):
For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.

Data updated

Jim Palmer (1965–1984) and Tom Seaver (1967–1986) — both came up during the 1960s, so the matchup is a direct one. Jim Palmer finished with 268 wins and 2,212 strikeouts; Tom Seaver finished with 311 wins and 3,640 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.

Quick answer

  • Who had the better ERA? Neither — both are at 2.86.
  • Who won more games? Tom Seaver, with 311 to Jim Palmer's 268.
  • Who recorded more strikeouts? Tom Seaver, with 3,640 to Jim Palmer's 2,212.
  • Who had the better WHIP? Tom Seaver, with 1.12 to Jim Palmer's 1.18.
  • Who pitched more innings? Tom Seaver, with 4,782.2 to Jim Palmer's 3,948.0.
  • Who threw more shutouts? Tom Seaver, with 61 to Jim Palmer's 53.
  • Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Tom Seaver, with 79,192 career Pitcher PIV to Jim Palmer's 19,502.
Leads Tom Seaver 10 of 12 scored categories
Pitcher PIV edge Tom Seaver +59,691
Read the verdict ↓

Jim Palmer

Pitcher · 1965–1984
Wins
268
Losses
152
Strikeouts
2,212
ERA
2.86
WHIP
1.18
IP
3,948.0
View Jim Palmer's full profile →

Tom Seaver

Pitcher · 1967–1986
Wins
311
Losses
205
Strikeouts
3,640
ERA
2.86
WHIP
1.12
IP
4,782.2
View Tom Seaver's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 12 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 4 are counting totals on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded them. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, so read them against the run environment each player worked in, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Jim Palmer vs Tom Seaver: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Jim Palmer Tom Seaver
Wins 268 Leads: 311
Losses not scored 152 205
Games 558 Leads: 656
Games Started 521 Leads: 647
Complete Games 211 Leads: 231
Shutouts 53 Leads: 61
Saves Leads: 4 1
Strikeouts 2,212 Leads: 3,640
Walks not scored 1,311 1,390
Hits Allowed not scored 3,349 3,971
Home Runs Allowed not scored 303 380
Innings Pitched 3,948.0 Leads: 4,782.2
ERA Leads: 2.86 2.86
WHIP 1.18 Leads: 1.12
K/9 5.04 Leads: 6.85
BB/9 2.99 Leads: 2.62

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Tom Seaver outpaces Jim Palmer 79,192 to 19,502 — driven by both sides of the ledger: 3,600 PIV per season to 1,026, across 22 seasons to 19. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Jim Palmer
19,502
Career Pitcher PIV · 1,026 per season (19 seasons)
Tom Seaver
79,192
Career Pitcher PIV · 3,600 per season (22 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).

Jim Palmer — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19722.07 ERA21-10, 184 K in 274 IP
19752.09 ERA23-11, 193 K in 323 IP
19692.34 ERA16-4, 123 K in 181 IP

Tom Seaver — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19711.76 ERA20-10, 289 K in 286 IP
19732.08 ERA19-10, 251 K in 290 IP
19682.20 ERA16-12, 205 K in 277 IP

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Tom Seaver leads in wins, strikeouts, WHIP, and K/9, while Jim Palmer owns ERA. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Tom Seaver. PIV agrees: Tom Seaver grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Jim Palmer and Tom Seaver careers compare

From 1967 through 1984, Jim Palmer and Tom Seaver were in the majors together. With 558 games against 656 across 19 and 22 PIV seasons, neither player's totals owe much to extra seasons. The green cells for Jim Palmer are saves (4 to 1) and ERA (2.86 to 2.86). The per-nine rows read 5.04 strikeouts and 2.99 walks for Jim Palmer, 6.85 and 2.62 for Tom Seaver. Jim Palmer was mainly a starter (521 starts in 558 games), and Tom Seaver was mainly a starter (647 starts in 656 games). Tom Seaver allowed fewer baserunners, a 1.12 WHIP to Jim Palmer's 1.18.

Jim Palmer vs Tom Seaver: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Jim Palmer or Tom Seaver?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Tom Seaver leads Jim Palmer in 10 of the 12 scored categories.
Who had the better ERA?
Neither — both are at 2.86.
Who won more games?
Tom Seaver, with 311 to Jim Palmer's 268.
Who recorded more strikeouts?
Tom Seaver, with 3,640 to Jim Palmer's 2,212.
Who had the better WHIP?
Tom Seaver, with 1.12 to Jim Palmer's 1.18.

See These Players in Another Era