Eddie Plank vs Ed Walsh: Career Stats Comparison
Eddie Plank has the better career line of the two, leading 7 of the 12 statistical categories compared on this page. Eddie Plank played 1901–1917 as a pitcher; Ed Walsh played 1904–1917 as a pitcher.
- ERA (Earned Run Average):
- Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
- W (Wins):
- Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
- SO (Strikeouts):
- For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
- WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
- Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.
Data updated
Eddie Plank (1901–1917) and Ed Walsh (1904–1917) — both came up during the 1900s, so the matchup is a direct one. Eddie Plank compiled 326 wins and 2,246 strikeouts; Ed Walsh put up 195 wins and 1,736 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.
Quick answer
- Who had the better ERA? Ed Walsh, with 1.82 to Eddie Plank's 2.35.
- Who won more games? Eddie Plank, with 326 to Ed Walsh's 195.
- Who recorded more strikeouts? Eddie Plank, with 2,246 to Ed Walsh's 1,736.
- Who had the better WHIP? Ed Walsh, with 1.00 to Eddie Plank's 1.12.
- Who pitched more innings? Eddie Plank, with 4,495 to Ed Walsh's 2,964.
- Who threw more shutouts? Eddie Plank, with 69 to Ed Walsh's 57.
- Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Ed Walsh, with 62,631 career Pitcher PIV to Eddie Plank's 51,914.
Eddie Plank
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted: compare them with the era in mind, or use the PIV card below, which is.
| Statistic | Eddie Plank | Ed Walsh |
|---|---|---|
| Wins | Leads: 326 | 195 |
| Losses | 194 | 126 |
| Games | Leads: 623 | 430 |
| Games Started | Leads: 529 | 315 |
| Complete Games | Leads: 410 | 250 |
| Shutouts | Leads: 69 | 57 |
| Saves | 23 | Leads: 35 |
| Strikeouts | Leads: 2,246 | 1,736 |
| Walks | 1,072 | 617 |
| Hits Allowed | 3,958 | 2,346 |
| Home Runs Allowed | 42 | 23 |
| Innings Pitched | Leads: 4,495 | 2,964 |
| ERA | 2.35 | Leads: 1.82 |
| WHIP | 1.12 | Leads: 1.00 |
| K/9 | 4.50 | Leads: 5.27 |
| BB/9 | 2.15 | Leads: 1.87 |
PIV Comparison
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Ed Walsh leads Eddie Plank 62,631 to 51,914 — a gap driven primarily by per-season impact (4,474 vs 3,054 per year). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).
Eddie Plank — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Ed Walsh — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Ed Walsh leads in ERA, WHIP, and K/9, while Eddie Plank owns wins, strikeouts, and innings pitched. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Ed Walsh. PIV agrees: Ed Walsh grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.
Related Matchups
Eddie Plank vs Ed Walsh: Frequently Asked Questions
- Who was better, Eddie Plank or Ed Walsh?
- By the career statistics compared on this page, Eddie Plank leads Ed Walsh in 7 of 12 categories.
- Who had the better ERA?
- Ed Walsh, with 1.82 to Eddie Plank's 2.35.
- Who won more games?
- Eddie Plank, with 326 to Ed Walsh's 195.
- Who recorded more strikeouts?
- Eddie Plank, with 2,246 to Ed Walsh's 1,736.
- Who had the better WHIP?
- Ed Walsh, with 1.00 to Eddie Plank's 1.12.