Jeff Reardon vs Hoyt Wilhelm: Career Stats Comparison

Hoyt Wilhelm has the better career line of the two, leading 9 of the 12 scored categories on this page (4 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Jeff Reardon played 1979–1994 as a pitcher; Hoyt Wilhelm played 1952–1972 as a pitcher.

ERA (Earned Run Average):
Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
W (Wins):
Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
SO (Strikeouts):
For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.

Data updated

Jeff Reardon (1979–1994) and Hoyt Wilhelm (1952–1972) — breaking in during the 1970s and the 1950s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. Jeff Reardon finished with 73 wins and 877 strikeouts; Hoyt Wilhelm finished with 143 wins and 1,610 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.

Quick answer

  • Who had the better ERA? Hoyt Wilhelm, with 2.52 to Jeff Reardon's 3.16.
  • Who won more games? Hoyt Wilhelm, with 143 to Jeff Reardon's 73.
  • Who recorded more strikeouts? Hoyt Wilhelm, with 1,610 to Jeff Reardon's 877.
  • Who had the better WHIP? Hoyt Wilhelm, with 1.12 to Jeff Reardon's 1.20.
  • Who pitched more innings? Hoyt Wilhelm, with 2,254.1 to Jeff Reardon's 1,132.1.
  • Who threw more shutouts? Hoyt Wilhelm, with 5 to Jeff Reardon's 0.
  • Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Hoyt Wilhelm, with 40,894 career Pitcher PIV to Jeff Reardon's 11,952.
Leads Hoyt Wilhelm 9 of 12 scored categories
Pitcher PIV edge Hoyt Wilhelm +28,943
Read the verdict ↓

Jeff Reardon

Pitcher · 1979–1994
Wins
73
Losses
77
Strikeouts
877
ERA
3.16
WHIP
1.20
IP
1,132.1
View Jeff Reardon's full profile →

Hoyt Wilhelm

Pitcher · 1952–1972
Wins
143
Losses
122
Strikeouts
1,610
ERA
2.52
WHIP
1.12
IP
2,254.1
View Hoyt Wilhelm's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 12 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 4 are counting totals on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded them. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 1970s and the 1950s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Jeff Reardon vs Hoyt Wilhelm: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Jeff Reardon Hoyt Wilhelm
Wins 73 Leads: 143
Losses not scored 77 122
Games 880 Leads: 1,070
Games Started 0 Leads: 52
Complete Games 0 Leads: 20
Shutouts 0 Leads: 5
Saves Leads: 367 227
Strikeouts 877 Leads: 1,610
Walks not scored 358 778
Hits Allowed not scored 1,000 1,757
Home Runs Allowed not scored 109 150
Innings Pitched 1,132.1 Leads: 2,254.1
ERA 3.16 Leads: 2.52
WHIP 1.20 Leads: 1.12
K/9 Leads: 6.97 6.43
BB/9 Leads: 2.85 3.11

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Hoyt Wilhelm outpaces Jeff Reardon 40,894 to 11,952 — driven by both sides of the ledger: 1,573 PIV per season to 664, across 26 seasons to 18. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Jeff Reardon
11,952
Career Pitcher PIV · 664 per season (18 seasons)
Hoyt Wilhelm
40,894
Career Pitcher PIV · 1,573 per season (26 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).

Jeff Reardon

No seasons meet the qualifying workload, so there is no peak-season list to show.

Hoyt Wilhelm — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19651.81 ERA7-7, 106 K in 144 IP
19641.99 ERA12-9, 95 K in 131 IP
19592.19 ERA15-11, 139 K in 226 IP

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Hoyt Wilhelm leads in wins, strikeouts, ERA, and WHIP, while Jeff Reardon owns K/9. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Hoyt Wilhelm. PIV agrees: Hoyt Wilhelm grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Jeff Reardon and Hoyt Wilhelm careers compare

The two careers never overlapped: Hoyt Wilhelm's ended in 1972, and Jeff Reardon debuted in 1979. The two careers are close in length, 880 games for Jeff Reardon and 1,070 for Hoyt Wilhelm across 18 and 26 PIV seasons, so the totals compare on fairly even terms. Jeff Reardon's edges on the table are saves (367 to 227), strikeouts per nine (6.97 to 6.43), and walks per nine (2.85 to 3.11). The per-nine rows read 6.97 strikeouts and 2.85 walks for Jeff Reardon, 6.43 and 3.11 for Hoyt Wilhelm.

Jeff Reardon vs Hoyt Wilhelm: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Jeff Reardon or Hoyt Wilhelm?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Hoyt Wilhelm leads Jeff Reardon in 9 of the 12 scored categories.
Who had the better ERA?
Hoyt Wilhelm, with 2.52 to Jeff Reardon's 3.16.
Who won more games?
Hoyt Wilhelm, with 143 to Jeff Reardon's 73.
Who recorded more strikeouts?
Hoyt Wilhelm, with 1,610 to Jeff Reardon's 877.
Who had the better WHIP?
Hoyt Wilhelm, with 1.12 to Jeff Reardon's 1.20.

See These Players in Another Era