Max Scherzer vs Early Wynn: Career Stats Comparison

Early Wynn has the better career line of the two, leading 7 of the 12 scored categories on this page (4 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Max Scherzer has played 2008–present as a pitcher; Early Wynn played 1939–1963 as a pitcher.

ERA (Earned Run Average):
Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
W (Wins):
Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
SO (Strikeouts):
For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.

Data updated

Max Scherzer (2008–present) and Early Wynn (1939–1963) — breaking in during the 2000s and the 1930s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. Max Scherzer has 225 wins and 3,557 strikeouts through October 12, 2026; Early Wynn finished with 300 wins and 2,334 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.

Quick answer

  • Who had the better ERA? Max Scherzer, with 3.29 to Early Wynn's 3.54.
  • Who won more games? Early Wynn, with 300 to Max Scherzer's 225.
  • Who recorded more strikeouts? Max Scherzer, with 3,557 to Early Wynn's 2,334.
  • Who had the better WHIP? Max Scherzer, with 1.09 to Early Wynn's 1.33.
  • Who pitched more innings? Early Wynn, with 4,564.0 to Max Scherzer's 3,047.2.
  • Who threw more shutouts? Early Wynn, with 49 to Max Scherzer's 5.
  • Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Max Scherzer, with 68,491 career Pitcher PIV to Early Wynn's 25,348.
Leads Early Wynn 7 of 12 scored categories
Pitcher PIV edge Max Scherzer +43,143
Read the verdict ↓

Max Scherzer

Pitcher · 2008–present
Wins
225
Losses
126
Strikeouts
3,557
ERA
3.29
WHIP
1.09
IP
3,047.2
View Max Scherzer's full profile →

Early Wynn

Pitcher · 1939–1963
Wins
300
Losses
244
Strikeouts
2,334
ERA
3.54
WHIP
1.33
IP
4,564.0
View Early Wynn's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 12 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 4 are counting totals on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded them. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 2000s and the 1930s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Max Scherzer is still active — his totals below are current through October 12, 2026.

Max Scherzer vs Early Wynn: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Max Scherzer Early Wynn
Wins 225 Leads: 300
Losses not scored 126 244
Games 501 Leads: 691
Games Started 492 Leads: 612
Complete Games 12 Leads: 290
Shutouts 5 Leads: 49
Saves 0 Leads: 15
Strikeouts Leads: 3,557 2,334
Walks not scored 814 1,775
Hits Allowed not scored 2,511 4,291
Home Runs Allowed not scored 369 338
Innings Pitched 3,047.2 Leads: 4,564.0
ERA Leads: 3.29 3.54
WHIP Leads: 1.09 1.33
K/9 Leads: 10.50 4.60
BB/9 Leads: 2.40 3.50

PIV Comparison through 2025

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Max Scherzer outpaces Early Wynn 68,491 to 25,348 — driven by per-season impact — 3,425 PIV per season to 1,102 — rather than by longevity, since Max Scherzer played 20 seasons to Early Wynn's 23. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.

Max Scherzer
68,491
Career Pitcher PIV · 3,425 per season (20 seasons)
Early Wynn
25,348
Career Pitcher PIV · 1,102 per season (23 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).

Max Scherzer — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

20222.29 ERA11-5, 173 K in 145 IP
20172.51 ERA16-6, 268 K in 200 IP
20182.53 ERA18-7, 300 K in 220 IP

Early Wynn — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19562.72 ERA20-9, 158 K in 277 IP
19542.73 ERA23-11, 155 K in 270 IP
19552.82 ERA17-11, 122 K in 230 IP

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Max Scherzer leads in strikeouts, ERA, WHIP, and K/9, while Early Wynn owns wins and innings pitched. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Max Scherzer. PIV agrees: Max Scherzer grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Max Scherzer and Early Wynn careers compare

Early Wynn (1939–1963) was finished before Max Scherzer (2008–present) arrived, so they never shared a league. The two careers are close in length, 501 games for Max Scherzer and 691 for Early Wynn across 20 and 23 PIV seasons, so the totals compare on fairly even terms. The per-nine rows read 10.50 strikeouts and 2.40 walks for Max Scherzer, 4.60 and 3.50 for Early Wynn. Both had the same role: Max Scherzer was mainly a starter (492 starts in 501 games); Early Wynn was mainly a starter (612 starts in 691 games). The complete-game row, 12 against 290, reflects how much longer starters once stayed in games. Because Max Scherzer is still playing, the totals above will keep moving through the season.

Max Scherzer vs Early Wynn: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Max Scherzer or Early Wynn?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Early Wynn leads Max Scherzer in 7 of the 12 scored categories.
Who had the better ERA?
Max Scherzer, with 3.29 to Early Wynn's 3.54.
Who won more games?
Early Wynn, with 300 to Max Scherzer's 225.
Who recorded more strikeouts?
Max Scherzer, with 3,557 to Early Wynn's 2,334.
Who had the better WHIP?
Max Scherzer, with 1.09 to Early Wynn's 1.33.

See These Players in Another Era