Pete Alexander vs Eddie Plank: Career Stats Comparison

Pete Alexander and Eddie Plank are close to even, splitting the 8 scored categories on this page 4–4 (8 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Pete Alexander played 1911–1930 as a pitcher; Eddie Plank played 1901–1917 as a pitcher.

ERA (Earned Run Average):
Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
W (Wins):
Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
SO (Strikeouts):
For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.

Data updated

Pete Alexander (1911–1930) and Eddie Plank (1901–1917) — they debuted in the 1910s and the 1900s respectively and share 7 seasons. Pete Alexander finished with 373 wins and 2,198 strikeouts; Eddie Plank finished with 326 wins and 2,246 strikeouts. The table below sets out their careers line by line.

Quick answer

  • Who leads the career comparison? Neither — they split the 8 scored categories 4–4.
  • Who had the better ERA? Eddie Plank, with 2.35 to Pete Alexander's 2.56.
  • Who won more games? Pete Alexander, with 373 to Eddie Plank's 326.
  • Who recorded more strikeouts? Eddie Plank, with 2,246 to Pete Alexander's 2,198.
  • Who had the better WHIP? Neither — both are at 1.12.
  • How many innings did each pitch? Pete Alexander 5,190.0, Eddie Plank 4,495.2.
  • Who threw more shutouts? Pete Alexander, with 90 to Eddie Plank's 69.
Even 4–4 across 8 scored categories
Pitcher PIV edge Pete Alexander +23,829
Read the verdict ↓

Pete Alexander

Pitcher · 1911–1930
Wins
373
Losses
208
Strikeouts
2,198
ERA
2.56
WHIP
1.12
IP
5,190.0
View Pete Alexander's full profile →

Eddie Plank

Pitcher · 1901–1917
Wins
326
Losses
194
Strikeouts
2,246
ERA
2.35
WHIP
1.12
IP
4,495.2
View Eddie Plank's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 8 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 8 are shown but not scored. Games, starts and innings measure playing time, and losses, walks and hits allowed track how long someone pitched, so they are left unmarked, as is any line where both players are at zero. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, so read them against the run environment each player worked in, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Pete Alexander vs Eddie Plank: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Pete Alexander Eddie Plank
Wins Leads: 373 326
Losses not scored 208 194
Games not scored 696 623
Games Started not scored 599 529
Complete Games Leads: 437 410
Shutouts Leads: 90 69
Saves not scored 32 23
Strikeouts 2,198 Leads: 2,246
Walks not scored 951 1,072
Hits Allowed not scored 4,868 3,958
Home Runs Allowed not scored 164 42
Innings Pitched not scored 5,190.0 4,495.2
ERA 2.56 Leads: 2.35
WHIP 1.12 Leads: 1.12
K/9 3.81 Leads: 4.50
BB/9 Leads: 1.65 2.15

PIV Comparison

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Pete Alexander outpaces Eddie Plank 75,743 to 51,914 — driven by both sides of the ledger: 3,787 PIV per season to 3,054, across 20 seasons to 17. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

Pete Alexander
75,743
Career Pitcher PIV · 3,787 per season (20 seasons)
Eddie Plank
51,914
Career Pitcher PIV · 3,054 per season (17 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).

Pete Alexander — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19151.22 ERA31-10, 241 K in 376 IP
19161.55 ERA33-12, 167 K in 389 IP
19191.72 ERA16-11, 121 K in 235 IP

Eddie Plank — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19091.76 ERA19-10, 132 K in 265 IP
19171.79 ERA5-6, 26 K in 131 IP
19102.01 ERA16-10, 123 K in 250 IP

Verdict

Pete Alexander and Eddie Plank split the 8 scored categories on the head-to-head card 4-4. On the raw scoreboard neither has the edge. PIV, which is era-adjusted, grades Pete Alexander higher. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Pete Alexander and Eddie Plank careers compare

From 1911 through 1917, Pete Alexander and Eddie Plank were in the majors together. The two careers are close in length, 696 games for Pete Alexander and 623 for Eddie Plank across 20 and 17 PIV seasons, so the totals compare on fairly even terms. Eddie Plank's edges on the table are strikeouts (2,246 to 2,198), ERA (2.35 to 2.56), and WHIP (1.12 to 1.12). The per-nine rows read 3.81 strikeouts and 1.65 walks for Pete Alexander, 4.50 and 2.15 for Eddie Plank. Both had the same role: Pete Alexander was mainly a starter (599 starts in 696 games); Eddie Plank was mainly a starter (529 starts in 623 games).

Pete Alexander vs Eddie Plank: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Pete Alexander or Eddie Plank?
By the career statistics compared on this page, neither leads: they split the 8 scored categories 4–4.
Who had the better ERA?
Eddie Plank, with 2.35 to Pete Alexander's 2.56.
Who won more games?
Pete Alexander, with 373 to Eddie Plank's 326.
Who recorded more strikeouts?
Eddie Plank, with 2,246 to Pete Alexander's 2,198.
Who had the better WHIP?
Neither — both are at 1.12.

See These Players in Another Era