Earl Averill vs Heinie Manush: Career Stats Comparison
Heinie Manush has the better career line of the two, leading 9 of the 14 statistical categories compared on this page. Earl Averill played 1929–1941 as a hitter; Heinie Manush played 1923–1939 as a hitter.
- AVG (Batting Average):
- Hits divided by at bats. .300 is the traditional mark of an excellent hitter.
- HR (Home Runs):
- Hits on which the batter circled the bases and scored, almost always by clearing the outfield fence.
- RBI (Runs Batted In):
- Runs that scored as a direct result of a batter's plate appearance.
- OPS (On-Base Plus Slugging):
- On-base percentage plus slugging percentage, the quickest single summary of offensive value. .900 or better is star-level.
Data updated
Earl Averill (1929–1941) and Heinie Manush (1923–1939) — both broke in during the 1920s, which makes the head-to-head feel like a contemporaries' debate. Earl Averill finished with 2,019 hits and 238 home runs; Heinie Manush finished with 2,524 hits and 110 home runs. Below is the full career table, PIV adjustment, peak seasons, and a verdict.
Quick answer
- Who hit more home runs? Earl Averill, with 238 to Heinie Manush's 110.
- Who had the higher OPS? Earl Averill, with .928 to Heinie Manush's .856.
- Who had the higher batting average? Heinie Manush, with .330 to Earl Averill's .318.
- Who had more hits? Heinie Manush, with 2,524 to Earl Averill's 2,019.
- Who drove in more runs? Heinie Manush, with 1,183 to Earl Averill's 1,164.
- Who has the higher career PIV? Earl Averill, with 33,953 career PIV to Heinie Manush's 23,488.
Earl Averill
Heinie Manush
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate for Earl Averill and Heinie Manush. Cells highlighted in green mark the category leader. Counting stats reward longevity, and strikeouts are left unmarked because a longer career accumulates more of them. Rate stats are not era-adjusted -- a .305 in 1965 and a .298 in 2001 came out of very different run environments -- so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.
| Statistic | Earl Averill | Heinie Manush |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 1,668 | Leads: 2,008 |
| At-Bats | 6,353 | Leads: 7,654 |
| Runs | 1,224 | Leads: 1,287 |
| Hits | 2,019 | Leads: 2,524 |
| Doubles | 401 | Leads: 491 |
| Triples | 128 | Leads: 160 |
| Home Runs | Leads: 238 | 110 |
| RBI | 1,164 | Leads: 1,183 |
| Walks | Leads: 774 | 506 |
| Strikeouts | 518 | 345 |
| Stolen Bases | 70 | Leads: 114 |
| Batting Avg | .318 | Leads: .330 |
| On-Base % | Leads: .395 | .377 |
| Slugging % | Leads: .534 | .479 |
| OPS | Leads: .928 | .856 |
PIV Comparison
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Earl Averill outpaces Heinie Manush 33,953 to 23,488 — a gap driven primarily by per-season impact (2,425 vs 1,236 per year). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by OPS among qualified workloads (300+ at-bats).
Earl Averill — top 3 seasons by OPS
Heinie Manush — top 3 seasons by OPS
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Heinie Manush leads in hits, RBI, runs, and stolen bases, while Earl Averill owns home runs, OBP, and OPS. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Heinie Manush. Note that PIV actually grades Earl Averill ahead, which means Heinie Manush's edge is partly volume. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.
Related Matchups
Earl Averill vs Heinie Manush: Frequently Asked Questions
- Who was better, Earl Averill or Heinie Manush?
- By the career statistics compared on this page, Heinie Manush leads Earl Averill in 9 of 14 categories.
- Did Earl Averill or Heinie Manush hit more home runs?
- Earl Averill, with 238 to Heinie Manush's 110.
- Who had the higher OPS?
- Earl Averill, with .928 to Heinie Manush's .856.
- Who had the higher batting average?
- Heinie Manush, with .330 to Earl Averill's .318.
- Who had more hits?
- Heinie Manush, with 2,524 to Earl Averill's 2,019.