Red Faber vs Ed Walsh: Career Stats Comparison
Ed Walsh has the better career line of the two, leading 7 of the 12 statistical categories compared on this page. Red Faber played 1914–1933 as a pitcher; Ed Walsh played 1904–1917 as a pitcher.
- ERA (Earned Run Average):
- Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
- W (Wins):
- Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
- SO (Strikeouts):
- For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
- WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
- Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.
Data updated
Red Faber (1914–1933) and Ed Walsh (1904–1917) — breaking in during the 1910s and the 1900s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. Red Faber compiled 254 wins and 1,471 strikeouts; Ed Walsh put up 195 wins and 1,736 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.
Quick answer
- Who had the better ERA? Ed Walsh, with 1.82 to Red Faber's 3.15.
- Who won more games? Red Faber, with 254 to Ed Walsh's 195.
- Who recorded more strikeouts? Ed Walsh, with 1,736 to Red Faber's 1,471.
- Who had the better WHIP? Ed Walsh, with 1.00 to Red Faber's 1.30.
- Who pitched more innings? Red Faber, with 4,086 to Ed Walsh's 2,964.
- Who threw more shutouts? Ed Walsh, with 57 to Red Faber's 29.
- Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Ed Walsh, with 62,631 career Pitcher PIV to Red Faber's 24,538.
Red Faber
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted: compare them with the era in mind, or use the PIV card below, which is.
| Statistic | Red Faber | Ed Walsh |
|---|---|---|
| Wins | Leads: 254 | 195 |
| Losses | 213 | 126 |
| Games | Leads: 669 | 430 |
| Games Started | Leads: 483 | 315 |
| Complete Games | Leads: 273 | 250 |
| Shutouts | 29 | Leads: 57 |
| Saves | 28 | Leads: 35 |
| Strikeouts | 1,471 | Leads: 1,736 |
| Walks | 1,213 | 617 |
| Hits Allowed | 4,106 | 2,346 |
| Home Runs Allowed | 111 | 23 |
| Innings Pitched | Leads: 4,086 | 2,964 |
| ERA | 3.15 | Leads: 1.82 |
| WHIP | 1.30 | Leads: 1.00 |
| K/9 | 3.24 | Leads: 5.27 |
| BB/9 | 2.67 | Leads: 1.87 |
PIV Comparison
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Ed Walsh outpaces Red Faber 62,631 to 24,538 — a gap driven primarily by per-season impact (4,474 vs 1,227 per year). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).
Red Faber — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Ed Walsh — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Ed Walsh leads in strikeouts, ERA, WHIP, and K/9, while Red Faber owns wins and innings pitched. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Ed Walsh. PIV agrees: Ed Walsh grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.
Related Matchups
Red Faber vs Ed Walsh: Frequently Asked Questions
- Who was better, Red Faber or Ed Walsh?
- By the career statistics compared on this page, Ed Walsh leads Red Faber in 7 of 12 categories.
- Who had the better ERA?
- Ed Walsh, with 1.82 to Red Faber's 3.15.
- Who won more games?
- Red Faber, with 254 to Ed Walsh's 195.
- Who recorded more strikeouts?
- Ed Walsh, with 1,736 to Red Faber's 1,471.
- Who had the better WHIP?
- Ed Walsh, with 1.00 to Red Faber's 1.30.