Charles Bender vs Eddie Plank: Career Stats Comparison

Eddie Plank has the better career line of the two, leading 5 of the 8 scored categories on this page (8 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Charles Bender played 1903–1925 as a pitcher; Eddie Plank played 1901–1917 as a pitcher.

ERA (Earned Run Average):
Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
W (Wins):
Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
SO (Strikeouts):
For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.

Data updated

Charles Bender (1903–1925) and Eddie Plank (1901–1917) — both debuted in the 1900s. Charles Bender finished with 212 wins and 1,711 strikeouts; Eddie Plank finished with 326 wins and 2,246 strikeouts. The table below sets out their careers line by line.

Quick answer

  • Who leads the career comparison? Eddie Plank, in 5 of the 8 scored categories.
  • Who had the better ERA? Eddie Plank, with 2.35 to Charles Bender's 2.46.
  • Who won more games? Eddie Plank, with 326 to Charles Bender's 212.
  • Who recorded more strikeouts? Eddie Plank, with 2,246 to Charles Bender's 1,711.
  • Who had the better WHIP? Charles Bender, with 1.11 to Eddie Plank's 1.12.
  • How many innings did each pitch? Charles Bender 3,017.0, Eddie Plank 4,495.2.
  • Who threw more shutouts? Eddie Plank, with 69 to Charles Bender's 40.
Leads Eddie Plank 5 of 8 scored categories
Pitcher PIV edge Eddie Plank +8,796
Read the verdict ↓

Charles Bender

Pitcher · 1903–1925
Wins
212
Losses
127
Strikeouts
1,711
ERA
2.46
WHIP
1.11
IP
3,017.0
View Charles Bender's full profile →

Eddie Plank

Pitcher · 1901–1917
Wins
326
Losses
194
Strikeouts
2,246
ERA
2.35
WHIP
1.12
IP
4,495.2
View Eddie Plank's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 8 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 8 are shown but not scored. Games, starts and innings measure playing time, and losses, walks and hits allowed track how long someone pitched, so they are left unmarked, as is any line where both players are at zero. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, so read them against the run environment each player worked in, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.

Charles Bender vs Eddie Plank: Career Stats Comparison — Career Stats Side-by-Side
Statistic Charles Bender Eddie Plank
Wins 212 Leads: 326
Losses not scored 127 194
Games not scored 459 623
Games Started not scored 334 529
Complete Games 255 Leads: 410
Shutouts 40 Leads: 69
Saves not scored 34 23
Strikeouts 1,711 Leads: 2,246
Walks not scored 712 1,072
Hits Allowed not scored 2,645 3,958
Home Runs Allowed not scored 40 42
Innings Pitched not scored 3,017.0 4,495.2
ERA 2.46 Leads: 2.35
WHIP Leads: 1.11 1.12
K/9 Leads: 5.10 4.50
BB/9 Leads: 2.12 2.15

PIV Comparison

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Eddie Plank leads Charles Bender 51,914 to 43,118 — driven by both sides of the ledger: 3,054 PIV per season to 2,695, across 17 seasons to 16. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

Charles Bender
43,118
Career Pitcher PIV · 2,695 per season (16 seasons)
Eddie Plank
51,914
Career Pitcher PIV · 3,054 per season (17 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).

Charles Bender — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19101.58 ERA23-5, 155 K in 250 IP
19091.66 ERA18-8, 161 K in 250 IP
19081.75 ERA8-9, 85 K in 138 IP

Eddie Plank — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19091.76 ERA19-10, 132 K in 265 IP
19171.79 ERA5-6, 26 K in 131 IP
19102.01 ERA16-10, 123 K in 250 IP

Verdict

Eddie Plank leads 5 of the 8 scored categories on the head-to-head card: wins, complete games, shutouts, strikeouts, and others. Charles Bender leads 3: WHIP, strikeouts per nine, and walks per nine. On the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Eddie Plank. PIV agrees: Eddie Plank grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

How the Charles Bender and Eddie Plank careers compare

Charles Bender and Eddie Plank were active at the same time between 1903 and 1917. The two careers are close in length, 459 games for Charles Bender and 623 for Eddie Plank across 16 and 17 PIV seasons, so the totals compare on fairly even terms. The green cells for Charles Bender are WHIP (1.11 to 1.12), strikeouts per nine (5.10 to 4.50), and walks per nine (2.12 to 2.15). By rate, Charles Bender struck out 5.10 and walked 2.12 per nine innings; Eddie Plank struck out 4.50 and walked 2.15. Charles Bender was mainly a starter (334 starts in 459 games), and Eddie Plank was mainly a starter (529 starts in 623 games).

Charles Bender vs Eddie Plank: Frequently Asked Questions

Who was better, Charles Bender or Eddie Plank?
By the career statistics compared on this page, Eddie Plank leads Charles Bender in 5 of the 8 scored categories.
Who had the better ERA?
Eddie Plank, with 2.35 to Charles Bender's 2.46.
Who won more games?
Eddie Plank, with 326 to Charles Bender's 212.
Who recorded more strikeouts?
Eddie Plank, with 2,246 to Charles Bender's 1,711.
Who had the better WHIP?
Charles Bender, with 1.11 to Eddie Plank's 1.12.

See These Players in Another Era