Burleigh Grimes vs Eddie Plank: Career Stats Comparison

Burleigh Grimes (1916–1934) and Eddie Plank (1901–1917) — breaking in during the 1910s and the 1900s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. Burleigh Grimes compiled 270 wins and 1,512 strikeouts; Eddie Plank put up 326 wins and 2,246 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.

Burleigh Grimes

Pitcher · 1916–1934
Wins
270
Losses
212
Strikeouts
1,512
ERA
3.53
WHIP
1.37
IP
4,180
View Burleigh Grimes's full profile →

Eddie Plank

Pitcher · 1901–1917
Wins
326
Losses
194
Strikeouts
2,246
ERA
2.35
WHIP
1.12
IP
4,495
View Eddie Plank's full profile →

Career Stats Side-by-Side

Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. For pitchers, lower ERA, WHIP, and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads.

Statistic Burleigh Grimes Eddie Plank
Wins 270 326
Losses 212 194
Games 616 623
Games Started 497 529
Complete Games 314 410
Shutouts 35 69
Saves 18 23
Strikeouts 1,512 2,246
Walks 1,295 1,072
Hits Allowed 4,412 3,958
Home Runs Allowed 148 42
Innings Pitched 4,180 4,495
ERA 3.53 2.35
WHIP 1.37 1.12
K/9 3.26 4.50
BB/9 2.79 2.15

PIV Comparison

By PIV (Player Impact Value), Eddie Plank outpaces Burleigh Grimes 51,914 to 18,821 — a gap driven primarily by per-season impact (3,054 vs 818 per year). PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.

Burleigh Grimes
18,821
Career Pitcher PIV · 818 per season (23 seasons)
Eddie Plank
51,914
Career Pitcher PIV · 3,054 per season (17 seasons)

How PIV is calculated →

Peak Seasons

The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).

Burleigh Grimes — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19182.13 ERA19-9, 113 K in 270 IP
19202.22 ERA23-11, 131 K in 303 IP
19212.83 ERA22-13, 136 K in 302 IP

Eddie Plank — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)

19091.76 ERA19-10, 132 K in 265 IP
19171.79 ERA5-6, 26 K in 131 IP
19102.01 ERA16-10, 123 K in 250 IP

Verdict

On the head-to-head card, Eddie Plank leads in wins, strikeouts, ERA, and WHIP, while Burleigh Grimes owns no headline categories. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Eddie Plank. PIV agrees: Eddie Plank grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.

Related Matchups

See These Players in Another Era