Red Faber vs Christy Mathewson: Career Stats Comparison
Christy Mathewson has the better career line of the two, leading 11 of the 12 scored categories on this page (4 further counting totals are shown but not scored). Red Faber played 1914–1933 as a pitcher; Christy Mathewson played 1900–1916 as a pitcher.
- ERA (Earned Run Average):
- Earned runs allowed per nine innings pitched: (ER × 9) ÷ IP. The primary measure of pitching effectiveness.
- W (Wins):
- Games credited to a pitcher whose team took a lead it never surrendered while he was the pitcher of record.
- SO (Strikeouts):
- For a batter, times retired on a third strike; for a pitcher, batters retired on a third strike.
- WHIP (Walks and Hits per Inning Pitched):
- Baserunners allowed per inning: (BB + H) ÷ IP. Under 1.00 is elite.
Data updated
Red Faber (1914–1933) and Christy Mathewson (1900–1916) — breaking in during the 1910s and the 1900s respectively, so they pitched against very different hitting environments. Red Faber finished with 254 wins and 1,471 strikeouts; Christy Mathewson finished with 373 wins and 2,507 strikeouts. The numbers below run them through identical career and rate-stat lenses.
Quick answer
- Who had the better ERA? Christy Mathewson, with 2.13 to Red Faber's 3.15.
- Who won more games? Christy Mathewson, with 373 to Red Faber's 254.
- Who recorded more strikeouts? Christy Mathewson, with 2,507 to Red Faber's 1,471.
- Who had the better WHIP? Christy Mathewson, with 1.06 to Red Faber's 1.30.
- Who pitched more innings? Christy Mathewson, with 4,788.2 to Red Faber's 4,086.2.
- Who threw more shutouts? Christy Mathewson, with 79 to Red Faber's 29.
- Who has the higher career Pitcher PIV? Christy Mathewson, with 82,446 career Pitcher PIV to Red Faber's 24,538.
Red Faber
Christy Mathewson
Career Stats Side-by-Side
Every cell below is a career total or career rate. Cells highlighted in green mark the player who leads that line. Lower ERA, WHIP and BB/9 lead; higher K/9 leads. 12 of the 16 lines below are scored; the other 4 are counting totals on which fewer is not an achievement, so no one is awarded them. Totals where fewer is not an achievement -- losses, walks and hits allowed -- are left unmarked, because they track how long someone pitched rather than how well. Rate stats are not era-adjusted, and the 1910s and the 1900s were different run environments, so read them against their eras, or use the PIV card below, which is adjusted.
| Statistic | Red Faber | Christy Mathewson |
|---|---|---|
| Wins | 254 | Leads: 373 |
| Losses not scored | 213 | 188 |
| Games | Leads: 669 | 636 |
| Games Started | 483 | Leads: 552 |
| Complete Games | 273 | Leads: 435 |
| Shutouts | 29 | Leads: 79 |
| Saves | 28 | Leads: 29 |
| Strikeouts | 1,471 | Leads: 2,507 |
| Walks not scored | 1,213 | 848 |
| Hits Allowed not scored | 4,106 | 4,219 |
| Home Runs Allowed not scored | 111 | 90 |
| Innings Pitched | 4,086.2 | Leads: 4,788.2 |
| ERA | 3.15 | Leads: 2.13 |
| WHIP | 1.30 | Leads: 1.06 |
| K/9 | 3.24 | Leads: 4.71 |
| BB/9 | 2.67 | Leads: 1.59 |
PIV Comparison through 2025
By PIV (Player Impact Value), Christy Mathewson outpaces Red Faber 82,446 to 24,538 — driven by per-season impact — 4,580 PIV per season to 1,227 — rather than by longevity, since Christy Mathewson played 18 seasons to Red Faber's 20. PIV adjusts each season to league baselines, so it's the cleanest way to compare careers across eras.
PIV is computed through the 2025 season. The career totals on this page include 2026 to date, so PIV does not yet reflect the 2026 season.
Peak Seasons
The best single seasons each player produced, ranked by ERA among qualified workloads (120+ innings).
Red Faber — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Christy Mathewson — top 3 seasons by ERA (lower is better)
Verdict
On the head-to-head card, Christy Mathewson leads in wins, strikeouts, ERA, and WHIP, while Red Faber owns no headline categories. That doesn't settle the era debate, but on the raw scoreboard the edge goes to Christy Mathewson. PIV agrees: Christy Mathewson grades out higher across their careers. Click through to each profile for the full season-by-season breakdown.
Related Matchups
How the Red Faber and Christy Mathewson careers compare
From 1914 through 1916, Red Faber and Christy Mathewson were in the majors together. With 669 games against 636 across 20 and 18 PIV seasons, neither player's totals owe much to extra seasons. The green cells for Red Faber are games (669 to 636). The per-nine rows read 3.24 strikeouts and 2.67 walks for Red Faber, 4.71 and 1.59 for Christy Mathewson. Red Faber was mainly a starter (483 starts in 669 games), and Christy Mathewson was mainly a starter (552 starts in 636 games). In WHIP, Christy Mathewson's 1.06 beats Red Faber's 1.30.
Red Faber vs Christy Mathewson: Frequently Asked Questions
- Who was better, Red Faber or Christy Mathewson?
- By the career statistics compared on this page, Christy Mathewson leads Red Faber in 11 of the 12 scored categories.
- Who had the better ERA?
- Christy Mathewson, with 2.13 to Red Faber's 3.15.
- Who won more games?
- Christy Mathewson, with 373 to Red Faber's 254.
- Who recorded more strikeouts?
- Christy Mathewson, with 2,507 to Red Faber's 1,471.
- Who had the better WHIP?
- Christy Mathewson, with 1.06 to Red Faber's 1.30.